Suppr超能文献

解决跨性别、异性恋男性和性暴力 LGBTIQ+ 幸存者的需求:人道主义组织在服务提供和资金优先事项方面的范围综述。

Addressing the needs of cisgender, heterosexual men and LGBTIQ+ survivors of sexual violence: a scoping review of service delivery and funding priorities among humanitarian organisations.

机构信息

Women's Refugee Commission, New York, NY, USA.

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan;19(1):2371389. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2024.2371389. Epub 2024 Jul 14.

Abstract

Sexual violence in humanitarian contexts is a global public health issue. Yet, evidence suggests that humanitarian organisations may not always be inclusive of cisgender, heterosexual men and LGBTIQ+ survivors in their responses. This scoping review examines the extent to which global organisations focusing on sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) address the needs of cisgender, heterosexual men and LGBTIQ+ survivors in service delivery and funding priorities. We examined grey literature published from 2013-2023 on SGBV service delivery and funding priorities in humanitarian contexts. Forty-seven documents were included in the final analyses, which comprised content and thematic analyses. Many of the documents acknowledged cisgender, heterosexual men or LGBTIQ+ individuals as at-risk groups; however, there was a lack of comprehensive discussion of these groups. Documents on LGBTIQ+ individuals referred to the group as a monolith, making little distinction among the LGBTIQ+ experience and the need to tailor responses to meet intersectional needs. Documents on men emphasised their role as perpetrators and allies, while overlooking that they also experience sexual violence. Findings support the critical need to address gaps in humanitarian programme and donor priorities to better ensure inclusion of cisgender, heterosexual men and LGBTIQ+ individuals without ignoring the needs of women and girls.

摘要

人道主义背景下的性暴力是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。然而,有证据表明,人道主义组织在应对性暴力和基于性别的暴力(SGBV)问题时,可能并不总是将顺性别、异性恋男性和 LGBTIQ+ 幸存者纳入考虑范围。本范围综述旨在考察专注于 SGBV 的全球组织在服务提供和资金优先事项方面,满足顺性别、异性恋男性和 LGBTIQ+ 幸存者需求的程度。我们研究了 2013 年至 2023 年期间在人道主义背景下发布的 SGBV 服务提供和资金优先事项方面的灰色文献。最终分析包括 47 份文件,这些文件采用内容分析和主题分析。许多文件承认顺性别、异性恋男性或 LGBTIQ+ 个人为高风险群体;然而,对这些群体缺乏全面讨论。关于 LGBTIQ+ 个人的文件将该群体视为一个整体,几乎没有区分 LGBTIQ+ 经验以及需要根据交叉需求调整应对措施。关于男性的文件强调了他们作为加害者和盟友的角色,而忽略了他们也会经历性暴力的事实。研究结果支持解决人道主义方案和捐助者优先事项中的差距的迫切需要,以更好地确保将顺性别、异性恋男性和 LGBTIQ+ 个人纳入其中,同时也不能忽视妇女和女孩的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验