Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thromb Res. 2024 Sep;241:109093. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109093. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
A variety of thromboprophylaxis regimens have been administered in patients following the Fontan procedure. However, consensus guidelines regarding the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy have not yet been developed.
A network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness among available thromboprophylaxis regimens and major bleeding events associated with these regimens.
A total of 28 comparative studies with 4430 Fontan patients were included. The incidence of thromboembolic events (TE) was significantly lower in individuals who underwent thromboprophylaxis compared to those who did not. Compared to a no-treatment strategy, nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) showed the largest treatment effect for preventing TE (OR = 0.08, 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.21), followed by warfarin (OR = 0.16, 95 % CI 0.10 to 0.27), and aspirin (OR = 0.23, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.38). Indeed, NOACs were significantly more effective than aspirin in preventing TE (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.84). Aspirin was associated with the lowest occurrence of major bleeding events, followed by NOACs, no medication, and warfarin. NOACs were shown to possess a highly favorable overall profile.
Prescribing thromboprophylaxis drugs, either antiplatelets or anticoagulants, may be more effective in preventing TE after the Fontan operation than not doing so. Among the included regimens, NOACs demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than aspirin; however, they did not show statistically significant superiority over warfarin. Aspirin exhibited lower rates of major bleeding compared to both NOACs and warfarin. Overall, NOACs tended to offer the most advantageous balance of efficacy and safety. However, the findings should be interpreted considering the certainty and limitations of the evidence, including potential residual confounding in observational studies.
Fontan 手术后,患者接受了各种血栓预防方案。然而,尚未制定关于最佳血栓预防策略的共识指南。
进行了网络荟萃分析,以评估可用的血栓预防方案之间的相对有效性以及与这些方案相关的主要出血事件。
共纳入了 28 项比较研究,涉及 4430 例 Fontan 患者。与未接受血栓预防的患者相比,接受血栓预防的患者血栓栓塞事件(TE)的发生率显著降低。与不治疗策略相比,新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs)在预防 TE 方面显示出最大的治疗效果(OR=0.08,95%CI 0.03 至 0.21),其次是华法林(OR=0.16,95%CI 0.10 至 0.27)和阿司匹林(OR=0.23,95%CI 0.14 至 0.38)。事实上,NOACs 在预防 TE 方面明显优于阿司匹林(OR=0.35,95%CI 0.14 至 0.84)。阿司匹林与主要出血事件的发生率最低相关,其次是 NOACs、无药物治疗和华法林。NOACs 显示出非常有利的总体特征。
与不进行血栓预防相比,Fontan 手术后开具抗血小板或抗凝药物的处方可能更有效地预防 TE。在纳入的方案中,NOACs 与阿司匹林相比,显示出显著更高的疗效;然而,与华法林相比,它们并没有显示出统计学上的优势。与 NOACs 和华法林相比,阿司匹林的主要出血率较低。总体而言,NOACs 倾向于提供最有利的疗效和安全性平衡。然而,应考虑证据的确定性和局限性,包括观察性研究中潜在的残余混杂因素,来解释这些发现。