Suppr超能文献

肥胖个体使用双倍剂量醋酸乌利司他进行紧急避孕:一项随机交叉试验。

Double dosing ulipristal acetate emergency contraception for individuals with obesity: a randomised crossover trial.

作者信息

Edelman Alison, Hennebold Jon D, Bond Kise, Lim Jeong Y, Cherala Ganesh, Blue Steven W, Kraft Shawn P, Erikson David W, Archer David, Jensen Jeffery

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jan 6;51(1):27-35. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202401.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether increasing the dose of ulipristal acetate (UPA)-containing emergency contraception (EC) improves pharmacodynamic outcomes in individuals with obesity.

STUDY DESIGN

We enrolled healthy, regularly-cycling, confirmed ovulatory, reproductive-age individuals with body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m and weight >80 kg in a randomised crossover study. We monitored participants with transvaginal ultrasound and blood sampling for progesterone, luteinising hormone (LH), and estradiol every other day until a dominant follicle measuring >15 mm was visualised. At that point, participants received either oral UPA EC 30 mg or 60 mg and returned for daily monitoring up to 7 days. After a no treatment washout cycle, participants returned for a second monitored cycle and received the other UPA dose. Our primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with no follicle rupture 5 days post-dosing (yes/no). For reference, we also enrolled a control group with BMI <25 kg/m and weight <80 kg who received UPA EC 30 mg during a single cycle. We also obtained blood samples for pharmacokinetic parameters for UPA and its active metabolite, -monodemethyl-UPA (NDM-UPA) as an optional substudy.

RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 52 participants with BMI >30 kg/m and 12 controls, with the following cycles completed: 12 controls, 49 UPA 30 mg, and 46 UPA 60 mg. The entire cohort demographics were a mean (SD) age of 29.8 (3.4) years and BMI by group: controls 22.5 (1.4) kg/m, group 1 37.9 (6.7) kg/m, and group 2 39.3 (5.4) kg/m. All 12 (100%) of controls had a delay of at least 5 days for follicle rupture. Among the high BMI group, dosing groups (UPA EC 30 mg vs 60 mg) were similar in the proportion of cycles without follicle rupture over 5 days post-UPA dosing (UPA 30 mg: 47/49 (96%), UPA 60 mg: 42/46 (91%), Fisher's exact test p=0.43). However, after excluding cycles where dosing occurred too late (after LH surge), a delay of at least 5 days occurred in all participants at both doses. The 60 mg UPA dose resulted in a twofold increase in maximum observed concentration and the area under the curve of both UPA and NDM-UPA levels compared with 30 mg.

CONCLUSION

A standard 30 mg dose of UPA is sufficient to delay ovulation regardless of BMI or weight. Results of our study do not support dose adjustment for body size.

摘要

目的

确定增加含醋酸乌利司他(UPA)的紧急避孕药(EC)剂量是否能改善肥胖个体的药效学结果。

研究设计

我们在一项随机交叉研究中纳入了健康、月经周期规律、已确认排卵的育龄个体,其体重指数(BMI)>30 kg/m²且体重>80 kg。我们每隔一天用经阴道超声和采集血液样本监测参与者的孕酮、促黄体生成素(LH)和雌二醇,直到观察到一个直径>15 mm的优势卵泡。此时,参与者口服30 mg或60 mg的UPA紧急避孕药,并返回进行长达7天的每日监测。在一个无治疗的洗脱期后,参与者返回进行第二个监测周期,并接受另一种UPA剂量。我们的主要结局是给药后5天无卵泡破裂的受试者比例(是/否)。作为对照参考,我们还纳入了一个BMI<25 kg/m²且体重<80 kg的对照组,他们在一个周期内接受30 mg的UPA紧急避孕药。作为一项可选的子研究,我们还采集了血液样本以测定UPA及其活性代谢物单去甲基-UPA(NDM-UPA)的药代动力学参数。

结果

我们共纳入了52名BMI>30 kg/m²的参与者和12名对照组,完成了以下周期:12名对照组、49个30 mg UPA周期和46个60 mg UPA周期。整个队列的人口统计学特征为平均(标准差)年龄29.8(3.4)岁,按组划分的BMI:对照组22.5(1.4)kg/m²,第1组37.9(6.7)kg/m²,第2组39.3(5.4)kg/m²。所有12名(100%)对照组的卵泡破裂至少延迟了5天。在高BMI组中,给药组(30 mg UPA紧急避孕药与60 mg UPA紧急避孕药)在UPA给药后5天无卵泡破裂的周期比例相似(30 mg UPA:47/49(96%),60 mg UPA:42/46(91%),Fisher精确检验p=0.43)。然而,在排除给药时间过晚(促黄体生成素高峰后)的周期后,两种剂量的所有参与者卵泡破裂均至少延迟了5天。与30 mg相比,60 mg UPA剂量使UPA和NDM-UPA水平的最大观察浓度和曲线下面积增加了两倍。

结论

无论BMI或体重如何标准剂量30 mg的UPA足以延迟排卵。我们的研究结果不支持根据体型调整剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe4/11874421/f7dac60856db/bmjsrh-51-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验