Suppr超能文献

运动剂量对纤维肌痛治疗效果的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Effects of exercise dosage on the treatment of fibromyalgia: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Yubei District of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Yubei District Hospital of TCM, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Sep;22(3):e1918. doi: 10.1002/msc.1918.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exercise intensity is a key component of an exercise prescription. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the treatment effect of different exercise doses on fibromyalgia syndrome.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception until 29 December 2023. The studies were subjected to screening using a 2-phase approach by 2 independent reviewers. Reference lists of the included studies were manually searched. Two independent reviewers extracted information regarding the origin, characteristics of study participants, eligibility criteria, characteristics of interventions, outcome measures, and main results using a pre-defined template.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis encompassed a total of 19 randomized controlled trials comprising 857 patients. Compared with the low compliance/uncertain group according to ACSM, the high compliance group showed better effectiveness in general condition improvement (SMD: -1.15 > -0.71), pain relief (SMD: -1.29 > -1.04), sleep quality enhancement (SMD: -1.66 > -1.08), and fatigue relief (SMD: -1.72 > -1.32). However, there was no difference in the improvement of mental health between the two groups (SMD: -0.93 > -0.92).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the ACSM group with compliance uncertainty (<70%), the high compliance group showed improvement in general conditions, pain, sleep quality, and fatigue. However, there was no difference in terms of mental health.

摘要

背景

运动强度是运动处方的一个关键组成部分。本荟萃分析旨在探讨不同运动剂量对纤维肌痛综合征的治疗效果。

方法

从建库至 2023 年 12 月 29 日,我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了检索。使用 2 阶段方法由 2 名独立审查员对研究进行筛选。手动搜索纳入研究的参考文献列表。两名独立审查员使用预定义模板提取关于起源、研究参与者特征、纳入标准、干预措施特征、结局测量和主要结果的信息。

结果

本荟萃分析共纳入 19 项随机对照试验,共 857 名患者。与 ACSM 不确定依从性/低依从性组相比,高依从性组在总体状况改善(SMD:-1.15 > -0.71)、疼痛缓解(SMD:-1.29 > -1.04)、睡眠质量改善(SMD:-1.66 > -1.08)和疲劳缓解(SMD:-1.72 > -1.32)方面更有效。然而,两组在心理健康改善方面无差异(SMD:-0.93 > -0.92)。

结论

与 ACSM 不确定依从性(<70%)组相比,高依从性组在一般状况、疼痛、睡眠质量和疲劳方面有所改善。然而,在心理健康方面没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验