Suppr超能文献

在先前接受过化疗和PD-1抑制剂治疗的转移性鼻咽癌二线治疗中重新使用PD-1抑制剂的疗效和安全性

Efficacy and Safety of Re-Challenging PD-1 Inhibitors in Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Previously Treated with Chemotherapy and PD-1 Inhibitors.

作者信息

Bei Weixin, Dong Shuhui, Liu Guoying, Lin Lanfeng, Jiang Yaofei, Lu Nian, Li Wangzhong, Liang Hu, Xiang Yanqun, Xia Weixiong

机构信息

Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Jul 10;16:771-780. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S460716. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who have progressed on prior anti-PD1 therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled patients with mNPC who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapy alone after prior progression of anti-PD1 therapy. The primary endpoint was progress-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were eligible between January 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-seven (38.5%) were in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group, while the remaining 59 patients (61.5%) were in the chemotherapy group. The ORR and DCR of PD-1 ICIs group and chemotherapy group were 37.8% vs 23.7% and 86.5% vs.74.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 21.1 months (IQR 16.1-28.7), the log-rank analysis demonstrated a significantly improved PFS in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group compared to the chemotherapy group (8.4 months [95% CI 4.3-14.0] vs 5.0 months [95% CI 2.8-7.2], 0.03). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (28.3 vs 24.1 months, 0.09). The two groups had similar adverse reactions, but the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group (18.9% vs 3.4%, 0.025).

CONCLUSION

mNPC patients who progressed from prior anti-PD1 therapy could benefit from the anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy. However, further validation is needed.

摘要

背景

我们旨在评估抗PD1再挑战联合化疗在先前接受抗PD1治疗后病情进展的转移性鼻咽癌(mNPC)患者中的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

我们纳入了在抗PD1治疗先前进展后接受化疗联合PD-1免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)或单纯化疗的mNPC患者。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、疾病控制率(DCR)和客观缓解率(ORR)。

结果

2015年1月至2020年12月期间共有96例患者符合条件。37例(38.5%)在PD-1 ICI再挑战组,其余59例患者(61.5%)在化疗组。PD-1 ICI组和化疗组的ORR和DCR分别为37.8%对23.7%和86.5%对74.5%。中位随访期21.1个月(IQR 16.1 - 28.7)后,对数秩分析显示PD-1 ICI再挑战组的PFS显著优于化疗组(8.4个月[95% CI 4.3 - 14.0]对5.0个月[95% CI 2.8 - 7.2],P = 0.03)。然而,两组之间的OS无显著差异(28.3对24.1个月,P = 0.09)。两组的不良反应相似,但PD-1 ICI再挑战组3/4级血小板减少症的发生率显著更高(18.9%对3.4%,P = 0.025)。

结论

先前抗PD1治疗进展的mNPC患者可从抗PD1再挑战联合化疗中获益。然而,需要进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b41/11246650/a6138be969c7/CMAR-16-771-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验