Suppr超能文献

计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA):一种优化住院医师在美国外科住院医师考试(ABSITE)中表现的迭代方法。

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA): An Iterative Approach to Optimize Residents Performance in the American Board of Surgery in-Training Exam (ABSITE).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI.

Department of Surgery, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2024 Oct;81(10):1452-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.022. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ITE), or ABSITE, preparation requires an effective study approach. In 2014, the ABS announced the alignment of ABSITE to the SCORE® Curriculum. We hypothesized that implementing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach would help surgery residents improve their performance on the ABSITE.

METHOD

Over 20 years, in a single institution, residents' ABSITE performance was evaluated over 3 timeframes: Time A (2004-2013), no specific curriculum; Time B (2014-2019), an annual comprehensive ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based multiple-choice exam (MCQ) was administered; and Time C (2020-2023), like Time B with the addition of the PDSA approach for those with less than 60% correct on the ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam. At the beginning of the academic year, in July, all residents are encouraged to (1) initiate a study plan for the upcoming ABSITE using SCORE® guided by the published ABSITE outlines content topics (Plan), (2) take an ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam in October (Do), (3) assess the results/scores (Study), and (4) identify appropriate next steps (Act). Correlational analysis was performed to evaluate the association between ABSITE scores and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time B and Time C. The primary outcome was the change in the proportions of ABSITE scores <30 percentile.

RESULTS

A total of 294 ABSITE scores of 94 residents (34 females and 60 males) were analyzed. We found stronger correlation between the correct percentage on ABSITE and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time C (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001) compared to Time B (0.62, p < 0.0001). The percentage of residents with ABSITE scores lower than 30 percentile dropped significantly from 14.0% to 3.7% (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Implementing the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach using the SCORE® curriculum significantly enhances residents' performance on the ABSITE exam. Surgery residents are encouraged to use this approach and to utilize the SCORE-contents outlined by the ABS in their study plan.

摘要

简介

美国外科学委员会(ABS)住院医师培训考试(ITE)或 ABSITE 的准备工作需要采取有效的学习方法。2014 年,ABS 宣布将 ABSITE 与 SCORE®课程对齐。我们假设实施计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)方法将有助于外科住院医师提高他们在 ABSITE 上的表现。

方法

在一个机构中,经过 20 多年的时间,根据三个时间框架评估住院医师的 ABSITE 表现:时间 A(2004-2013 年),没有特定的课程;时间 B(2014-2019 年),每年都会进行一次基于全面的 ABSITE 模拟 SCORE®的多项选择题考试(MCQ);时间 C(2020-2023 年),与时间 B 相同,对于 ABSITE 模拟 SCORE®考试中得分低于 60%的人,采用 PDSA 方法。在学年开始时,即 7 月,所有住院医师都被鼓励(1)根据发布的 ABSITE 大纲内容主题(计划)使用 SCORE®制定即将到来的 ABSITE 学习计划,(2)在 10 月参加基于 ABSITE 模拟的 SCORE®考试(执行),(3)评估结果/分数(研究),(4)确定适当的下一步(行动)。对时间 B 和时间 C 中的 ABSITE 分数与基于 ABSITE 模拟的 SCORE®考试分数之间的相关性进行了相关分析。主要结果是 ABSITE 分数<30%的比例变化。

结果

共分析了 94 名住院医师的 294 个 ABSITE 分数(34 名女性和 60 名男性)。我们发现,与时间 B(0.62,p < 0.0001)相比,时间 C 中 ABSITE 分数与基于 ABSITE 模拟的 SCORE®考试分数之间的相关性更强(r=0.73,p<0.0001)。ABSITE 分数低于 30%的住院医师比例从 14.0%显著下降到 3.7%(p=0.016)。

结论

使用 SCORE®课程实施计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)方法显著提高了住院医师在 ABSITE 考试中的表现。鼓励外科住院医师使用这种方法,并在他们的学习计划中使用 ABS 列出的 SCORE 内容。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验