• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用单药或联合抗生素疗法治疗腹腔内感染是合适的。

Treatment of intra-abdominal infections is appropriate with single-agent or combination antibiotic therapy.

作者信息

Malangoni M A, Condon R E, Spiegel C A

出版信息

Surgery. 1985 Oct;98(4):648-55.

PMID:3901372
Abstract

In a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial, we studied 112 adults with intra-abdominal infections and compared antibiotic therapy with cefoxitin plus placebo to therapy with tobramycin plus clindamycin. Seventy-five percent of patients receiving tobramycin-clindamycin and 71% of those receiving cefoxitin-placebo had either shock, bacteremia, malnutrition, alcoholism, rapidly or ultimately fatal underlying disease, infection originating from the distal small bowel or colon, or had had failed therapy before treatment ("high-risk" group). One third of the patients in both groups grew bacteria in the initial culture resistant to the antibiotic regimen used. Ten patients receiving cefoxitin-placebo (17%) and 11 receiving tobramycin-clindamycin (21%) had recurrence of infection or died of infection (clinical failures). Nineteen failures occurred in high-risk patients (p less than 0.05) and 17 were in patients that had antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the initial culture (p less than 0.01). Adverse effects were rare and remitted after antibiotics were stopped. Our results suggest that both cefoxitin and tobramycin-clindamycin are appropriate antibiotic regimens to treat intra-abdominal infections. Clinical failure is more common in high-risk patients and when antibiotic-resistant organisms are isolated from initial cultures.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、随机、单盲试验中,我们研究了112例患有腹腔内感染的成年人,并将头孢西丁加安慰剂的抗生素治疗与妥布霉素加克林霉素的治疗进行了比较。接受妥布霉素 - 克林霉素治疗的患者中有75%以及接受头孢西丁 - 安慰剂治疗的患者中有71%患有休克、菌血症、营养不良、酗酒、患有迅速或最终致命的基础疾病、感染源自远端小肠或结肠,或在治疗前治疗失败(“高危”组)。两组中均有三分之一的患者在初始培养中培养出对所用抗生素方案耐药的细菌。接受头孢西丁 - 安慰剂治疗的10例患者(17%)和接受妥布霉素 - 克林霉素治疗的11例患者(21%)出现感染复发或死于感染(临床失败)。19例失败发生在高危患者中(p<0.05),17例发生在初始培养中有抗生素耐药菌的患者中(p<0.01)。不良反应很少见,停用抗生素后缓解。我们的结果表明,头孢西丁和妥布霉素 - 克林霉素都是治疗腹腔内感染的合适抗生素方案。临床失败在高危患者中以及从初始培养中分离出抗生素耐药菌时更为常见。

相似文献

1
Treatment of intra-abdominal infections is appropriate with single-agent or combination antibiotic therapy.采用单药或联合抗生素疗法治疗腹腔内感染是合适的。
Surgery. 1985 Oct;98(4):648-55.
2
A prospective randomized controlled trial of cefoxitin versus clindamycin-aminoglycoside in mixed anaerobic-aerobic infections.头孢西丁与克林霉素 - 氨基糖苷类药物治疗混合性需氧 - 厌氧菌感染的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 May;154(5):715-20.
3
Cefoxitin plus tobramycin and clindamycin plus tobramycin. A prospective randomized comparison in the therapy of mixed aerobic/anaerobic infections.
Arch Surg. 1986 Aug;121(8):891-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400080033005.
4
A randomized controlled trial of moxalactam versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of mixed anaerobic/aerobic infections.一项比较羟羧氧酰胺菌素与克林霉素/妥布霉素治疗需氧菌与厌氧菌混合感染的随机对照试验。
Am Surg. 1986 Sep;52(9):467-71.
5
Prospective, randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of netilmicin-clindamycin and tobramycin-clindamycin in the treatment of serious systemic infections.奈替米星-克林霉素与妥布霉素-克林霉素治疗严重全身感染疗效及安全性的前瞻性随机对照研究
Clin Ther. 1985;7(4):497-506.
6
Cefoxitin versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of postcesarean section infections.
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Mar;67(3):371-6.
7
Ceftazidime/clindamycin versus tobramycin/clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Am Surg. 1990 Oct;56(10):613-7.
8
A prospective randomized study of moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in penetrating abdominal trauma.一项关于头孢氧哌唑与庆大霉素及克林霉素治疗腹部穿透伤的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jul;163(1):1-4.
9
High-dose tobramycin combined with clindamycin or lincomycin in the treatment of septic peritonitis and intraabdominal sepsis.大剂量妥布霉素联合克林霉素或林可霉素治疗化脓性腹膜炎和腹腔内脓毒症。
Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147(5):339-46.
10
A comparison of two antibiotic regimens for treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.两种抗生素治疗方案用于盆腔炎治疗的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;72(1):7-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.加拿大外科腹腔内感染诊疗指南
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010 Spring;21(1):11-37. doi: 10.1155/2010/580340.
2
Peritonitis - the Western experience.腹膜炎——西方的经验。
World J Emerg Surg. 2006 Sep 5;1:25. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-1-25.
3
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.成人胃肠道源性继发性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.
4
Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.头孢菌素类药物的药理学、药代动力学及临床应用综述。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1990;17(3):203-15.
5
Current concepts in peritonitis.腹膜炎的当前概念
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003 Aug;5(4):295-301. doi: 10.1007/s11894-003-0066-y.
6
Prospective randomized trials affect the outcomes of intraabdominal infection.前瞻性随机试验会影响腹腔内感染的结果。
Ann Surg. 2001 Jun;233(6):859-66. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200106000-00017.
7
Piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗混合感染
Intensive Care Med. 1994 Jul;20 Suppl 3:S27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01745248.
8
Intra-abdominal infections in children. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management.儿童腹腔内感染。发病机制、诊断与管理
Drugs. 1993 Jul;46(1):53-62. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199346010-00004.
9
Postoperative infection prophylaxis for upper gastrointestinal tract surgery--a prospective and comparative randomized study of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime.上消化道手术术后感染的预防——头孢西丁和头孢唑肟的前瞻性对比随机研究
Jpn J Surg. 1989 May;19(3):255-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02471399.
10
Pharmacokinetic evaluation of two dosage regimens of clindamycin phosphate.磷酸克林霉素两种给药方案的药代动力学评价
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 May;33(5):618-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.5.618.