Nelson Anna, Romanis Elizabeth Chloe, Adkins Victoria, Weis Christina, Kuberska Karolina
School of Law, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7ND, UK.
Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
J Law Biosci. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):lsae013. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsae013. eCollection 2024 Jul-Dec.
Artificial Amnion and Placenta Technology (AAPT)-sometimes referred to as 'Artificial Womb Technology'-could provide an extracorporeal alternative to bodily gestations, allowing a fetus delivered prematurely from the human uterus to continue development while maintaining fetal physiology. As AAPT moves nearer to being used in humans, important ethical and legal questions remain unanswered. In this paper, we explore how the death of the entity sustained by AAPT would be characterized in law. This question matters, as legal ambiguity in this area has the potential to compound uncertainty and the suffering of newly bereaved parent(s). We first identify the existing criteria used to delineate the legal characterization of death, which occurs before birth or during the immediate neonatal period in England and Wales. We then demonstrate that attempting to apply these in the context of AAPT gives rise to a number of challenges, which make it impossible to reach a definitive conclusion as to the nature of death in AAPT using the current legal framework. In doing so, we demonstrate that the current legal framework in England and Wales may be unable to adequately capture the situation of an entity being sustained by AAPT.
人工羊膜和胎盘技术(AAPT)——有时也被称为“人造子宫技术”——可以为体内妊娠提供一种体外替代方案,使从人类子宫早产的胎儿能够在维持胎儿生理机能的同时继续发育。随着AAPT越来越接近应用于人类,重要的伦理和法律问题仍未得到解答。在本文中,我们探讨了由AAPT维持的实体的死亡在法律上应如何界定。这个问题很重要,因为这一领域的法律模糊性有可能加剧不确定性以及新近丧亲父母的痛苦。我们首先确定用于界定死亡法律特征的现有标准,在英格兰和威尔士,死亡发生在出生前或新生儿期的即刻。然后我们证明,试图在AAPT的背景下应用这些标准会带来一些挑战,这使得使用当前法律框架无法就AAPT中死亡的性质得出明确结论。在此过程中,我们证明英格兰和威尔士的现行法律框架可能无法充分涵盖由AAPT维持的实体的情况。