Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4785-4797. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16470. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Neuroscience has largely conceptualized inner speech, sometimes called covert speech, as being a part of the language system, namely, a precursor to overt speech and/or speech without the motor component (impoverished motor speech). Yet interdisciplinary work has strongly suggested that inner speech is multidimensional and situated within the language system as well as in more domain general systems. By leveraging evidence from philosophy, linguistics, neuroscience and cognitive science, we argue that neuroscience can gain a more comprehensive understanding of inner speech processes. We will summarize the existing knowledge on the traditional approach to understanding the neuroscience of inner speech, which is squarely through the language system, before discussing interdisciplinary approaches to understanding the cognitive, linguistic and neural substrates/mechanisms that may be involved in inner speech. Given our own interests in inner speech after brain injury, we finish by discussing the theoretical and clinical benefits of researching inner speech in aphasia through an interdisciplinary lens.
神经科学在很大程度上将内部言语(有时称为隐性言语)概念化为语言系统的一部分,即口语的前导,或没有运动成分的言语(言语匮乏)。然而,跨学科的工作强烈表明,内部言语是多维的,既存在于语言系统中,也存在于更广泛的领域一般系统中。通过利用哲学、语言学、神经科学和认知科学的证据,我们认为神经科学可以更全面地理解内部言语过程。我们将总结传统方法理解内部言语神经科学的现有知识,该方法直接通过语言系统,然后讨论理解可能涉及内部言语的认知、语言和神经基质/机制的跨学科方法。鉴于我们自己对脑损伤后内部言语的兴趣,我们最后通过跨学科的视角讨论了通过研究失语症中的内部言语来获得理论和临床收益。