• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新州法律和电子健康记录提示对学术医疗中心纳洛酮处方的影响。

Impact of a new state law and electronic health record prompt on naloxone prescribing in an academic medical center.

机构信息

MUSC Health, Charleston, SC, and Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcome Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

MUSC Health, Charleston, SC, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Nov 22;81(Supplement_5):S189-S196. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae199.

DOI:10.1093/ajhp/zxae199
PMID:39016435
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a best-practice advisory (BPA) and South Carolina legislation on naloxone prescribing patterns. The primary objective was to assess the change in naloxone prescription rates following BPA implementation. The secondary objective was to analyze the performance of the BPA.

METHODS

Naloxone prescriptions generated before (July 28, 2020, through July 27, 2021) and after (July 28, 2021, through July 28, 2022) BPA implementation were analyzed via retrospective chart review. Lists of patients at risk for opioid overdose and patients for whom the BPA fired were generated for March 2022. The BPA's effectiveness was evaluated based on the proportion of at-risk patients missed by the alert, the frequency with which the BPA resulted in a naloxone prescription, and the reasons for not prescribing naloxone when the BPA fired.

RESULTS

Following BPA implementation, there was a significant increase in the average monthly naloxone prescribing rate from 66.1 to 625.5 prescriptions per month. Overall, 2,086 patients were considered at risk for opioid overdose and 1,101 had a BPA alert during March 2022, with 32.7% of BPA alerts resulting in naloxone prescribing. The most common reasons selected for not prescribing naloxone were "patient refusal" and "criteria not met." Only 354 patients (17.1%) at risk for opioid overdose also had a BPA alert.

CONCLUSION

State legislation and implementation of the BPA significantly increased naloxone prescribing rates. However, a significant proportion of patients identified as being at risk did not have a BPA alert and most BPA alerts did not result in naloxone prescribing, suggesting a need for improvement of the BPA.

摘要

目的

评估最佳实践咨询(BPA)和南卡罗来纳州立法对纳洛酮处方模式的影响。主要目的是评估 BPA 实施后纳洛酮处方率的变化。次要目的是分析 BPA 的性能。

方法

通过回顾性病历审查分析 BPA 实施前后(2020 年 7 月 28 日至 2021 年 7 月 27 日和 2021 年 7 月 28 日至 2022 年 7 月 28 日)生成的纳洛酮处方。为 2022 年 3 月生成了有阿片类药物过量风险的患者和 BPA 触发的患者名单。根据警报漏报的高危患者比例、BPA 导致纳洛酮处方的频率以及 BPA 触发时未开具纳洛酮的原因,评估 BPA 的有效性。

结果

BPA 实施后,平均每月纳洛酮处方率从 66.1 份增加到 625.5 份。总体而言,2022 年 3 月有 2086 名患者被认为有阿片类药物过量的风险,1101 名患者有 BPA 警报,其中 32.7%的 BPA 警报导致开具纳洛酮处方。选择不开具纳洛酮的最常见原因是“患者拒绝”和“不符合标准”。只有 354 名(17.1%)有阿片类药物过量风险的患者也有 BPA 警报。

结论

州立法和 BPA 的实施显著提高了纳洛酮的处方率。然而,很大一部分被确定为有风险的患者没有 BPA 警报,而且大多数 BPA 警报并没有导致纳洛酮处方,这表明需要改进 BPA。

相似文献

1
Impact of a new state law and electronic health record prompt on naloxone prescribing in an academic medical center.新州法律和电子健康记录提示对学术医疗中心纳洛酮处方的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Nov 22;81(Supplement_5):S189-S196. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae199.
2
Implementing an overdose education and naloxone distribution program in a health system.在一个卫生系统中实施过量用药教育和纳洛酮分发项目。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Mar-Apr;57(2S):S154-S160. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
3
Increasing Naloxone Access and Prescribing for Patients on High-Dose Opioids From a Managed Care Pharmacy Health Plan Perspective.从管理式医疗药房健康计划的角度来看增加纳洛酮的获取和为高剂量阿片类药物患者开处方的机会。
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Dec;37(6):1291-1296. doi: 10.1177/08971900241247598. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Do electronic health record prompts increase take-home naloxone administration for emergency department patients after an opioid overdose?电子健康记录提示是否会增加急诊科阿片类药物过量患者的纳洛酮带离医嘱?
Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1575-1581. doi: 10.1111/add.14635. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
5
Association Between a State Law Allowing Pharmacists to Dispense Naloxone Without a Prescription and Naloxone Dispensing Rates.州法律允许药剂师在没有处方的情况下配给纳洛酮与纳洛酮配给率之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20310.
6
Clinical Decision Support to Increase Emergency Department Naloxone Coprescribing: Implementation Report.临床决策支持以增加急诊纳洛酮共同处方:实施报告。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 6;12:e58276. doi: 10.2196/58276.
7
Impact of an emergency department opioid prescribing guideline on emergency physician behaviour and incidence of overdose in the Saskatoon Health Region: a retrospective pre-post implementation analysis.《萨斯卡通地区急诊部阿片类药物处方指南对急诊医师行为和用药过量发生率的影响:回顾性实施前后分析》
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 29;9(1):E79-E86. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200071. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
8
Naloxone and Buprenorphine Prescribing Following US Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Opioid Overdose: August 2019 to April 2021.纳洛酮和丁丙诺啡处方后,美国急诊疑似阿片类药物过量:2019 年 8 月至 2021 年 4 月。
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;79(3):225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
9
Implementation of a Naloxone Best Practice Advisory Into an Electronic Health Record.将纳洛酮最佳实践建议纳入电子健康记录的实施。
J Addict Med. 2023;17(3):346-348. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001102. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
10
Legal requirements and recommendations to prescribe naloxone.合法要求和建议开具纳洛酮处方。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Apr 1;209:107896. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107896. Epub 2020 Feb 6.