Differential diagnostic value of radiomics models in benign versus malignant vertebral compression fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

Early diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures by analyzing imaging data is crucial to guide treatment and assess prognosis, and the development of radiomics made it an alternative option to biopsy examination. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the purpose of quantifying the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.

METHODS

Searching on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify eligible studies published before September 23, 2023. After evaluating for methodological quality and risk of bias using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), we selected studies providing confusion matrix results to be included in random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of sixteen articles, involving 1,519 vertebrae with pathological-diagnosed tumor infiltration, were included in our meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity and specificity of the top-performing models were 0.92 (95 % CI: 0.87-0.96) and 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.88-0.96), respectively. Their AUC was 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.96-0.99). By contrast, radiologists' combined sensitivity was 0.90 (95 %CI: 0.75-0.97) and specificity was 0.92 (95 %CI: 0.67-0.98). The AUC was 0.96 (95 %CI: 0.94-0.97). Subsequent subgroup analysis and sensitivity test suggested that part of the heterogeneity might be explained by differences in imaging modality, segmentation, deep learning and cross-validation.

CONCLUSION

We found remarkable diagnosis potential in correctly distinguishing vertebral compression fractures in complex clinical contexts. However, the published radiomics models still have a great heterogeneity, and more large-scale clinical trials are essential to validate their generalizability.