Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; GZO AG Spital Wetzikon, Spitalstrasse 66, Wetzikon 8620, Switzerland.
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Sep;178:111614. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111614. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
To assess the density values of breast lesions and breast tissue using non-contrast spiral breast CT (nc-SBCT) imaging.
In this prospective study women undergoing nc-SBCT between April-October 2023 for any purpose were included in case of: histologically proven malignant lesion (ML); fibroadenoma (FA) with histologic confirmation or stability > 24 months (retrospectively); cysts with ultrasound correlation; and women with extremely dense breast (EDB) and no sonographic findings. Three regions of interest were placed on each lesion and 3 different area of EDB. The evaluation was performed by two readers (R1 and R2). Kruskal-Wallis test, intraclass correlation (ICC) and ROC analysis were used.
40 women with 12 ML, 10 FA, 15 cysts and 9 with EDB were included. Median density values and interquartile ranges for R1 and R2 were: 60.2 (53.3-67.3) and 62.5 (55.67-76.3) HU for ML; 46.3 (41.9-59.5) and 44.5 (40.5-59.8) HU for FA; 35.3 (24.3-46.0) and 39.7 (26.7-52.0) HU for cysts; and 28.7 (24.2-33.0) and 33.3 (31.7-36.8) HU for EDB. For both readers, densities were significantly different for ML versus EDB (p < 0.001) and cysts (p < 0.001) and for FA versus EDB (p=/<0.003). The AUC was 0.925 (95 %CI 0.858-0.993) for R1 and 0.942 (0.884-1.00) for R2 when comparing ML versus others and 0.792 (0.596-0.987) and 0.833 (0.659-1) when comparing ML versus FA. The ICC showed an almost perfect inter-reader (0.978) and intra-reader agreement (>0.879 for both readers).
In nc-SBCT malignant lesions have higher density values compared to normal tissue and measurements of density values are reproducible between different readers.
使用非对比螺旋式乳腺 CT(nc-SBCT)成像评估乳腺病变和乳腺组织的密度值。
在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了 2023 年 4 月至 10 月间因任何原因接受 nc-SBCT 检查的女性,如果符合以下情况,则纳入病例组:经组织学证实的恶性病变(ML);经组织学证实或稳定性>24 个月的纤维腺瘤(FA)(回顾性);与超声相关的囊肿;以及乳腺极度致密(EDB)且无超声发现的女性。在每个病变和 EDB 的 3 个不同区域放置 3 个感兴趣区域。由 2 位读者(R1 和 R2)进行评估。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验、组内相关系数(ICC)和 ROC 分析进行分析。
共纳入 40 名女性,其中 12 名为 ML,10 名为 FA,15 名为囊肿,9 名为 EDB。R1 和 R2 的中位数密度值和四分位距分别为:ML 为 60.2(53.3-67.3)和 62.5(55.67-76.3)HU;FA 为 46.3(41.9-59.5)和 44.5(40.5-59.8)HU;囊肿为 35.3(24.3-46.0)和 39.7(26.7-52.0)HU;EDB 为 28.7(24.2-33.0)和 33.3(31.7-36.8)HU。对于两位读者,ML 与 EDB(p<0.001)和囊肿(p<0.001)之间的密度值差异有统计学意义,FA 与 EDB(p<0.003)之间的密度值差异有统计学意义。R1 比较 ML 与其他病变的 AUC 为 0.925(95%CI 0.858-0.993),R2 为 0.942(0.884-1.00),而 R1 比较 ML 与 FA 的 AUC 为 0.792(0.596-0.987),R2 为 0.833(0.659-1)。ICC 显示读者间的一致性近乎完美(0.978),读者内的一致性>0.879(两位读者均如此)。
在 nc-SBCT 中,恶性病变的密度值高于正常组织,且不同读者之间的密度值测量具有可重复性。