Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Sep;33(9):107878. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107878. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
Intracerebral hemorrhages are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While the ENRICH trial supports the efficacy of surgical evacuation for lobar hemorrhages, the impact of antithrombotic therapies on minimally invasive surgery outcomes remains unexplored. This study evaluates the effects of chronic anticoagulants and antiplatelets on the technical and longterm outcomes of minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation.
A prospectively collected registry of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage from a single institution was analyzed (December 2015-September 2022). Data included key demographics, comorbidities, antithrombotic/reversal status, presenting clinical/radiographic characteristics, procedural metrics, and clinical outcomes. Patients were divided into control (neither therapy), antiplatelet-only, and anticoagulant-only groups, with antiplatelet/anticoagulant reversals conducted per current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Variables significant in univariate analyses (p<0.05) were advanced to multivariable regression models.
Among 226 intracerebral hemorrhage patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, 41% (N=93) had antithrombotic medication history; 28% (N=64) received antiplatelets, and 9% (N=21) received anticoagulants. Patients on both therapies (N=6) were excluded. The antiplatelet group presented more frequently with lobar hemorrhages (56% vs. 37%; p=0.022), while patients on anticoagulants showed increased rates of intraventricular hemorrhage co-presentation (62% vs. 46%; p=0.011) compared to controls. Despite univariate analyses showing a higher postoperative hematoma volume (3.9 vs. 2.9 milliliters; p=0.020) and lower evacuation percentage (88% vs. 92%; p=0.019) for the antiplatelet group, and longer procedures for patients on anticoagulants (2.3 vs. 1.7 hours; p=0.042) compared to control, multivariable analyses indicated that antiplatelets and anticoagulants had no significant impact on these technical outcomes. Longitudinally, antithrombotics were not associated with increased rebleeding, less frequent discharge to home, lower 30-day mortality, or worse, 6-month Modified Rankin Scale scores.
Patients on chronic antiplatelets and anticoagulants exhibited characteristic intracerebral hemorrhage phenotypes without worse technical or long-term outcomes after minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation, suggesting the procedure's safety for these patients.
脑出血与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。虽然 ENRICH 试验支持手术清除额叶血肿的疗效,但抗血栓治疗对微创血肿清除术结果的影响仍未得到探索。本研究评估慢性抗凝剂和抗血小板药物对微创脑出血清除术的技术和长期结果的影响。
对单中心接受微创脑出血手术的患者进行了前瞻性登记(2015 年 12 月至 2022 年 9 月)。数据包括主要人口统计学、合并症、抗血栓/逆转状态、临床表现/影像学特征、手术指标和临床结果。患者分为对照组(未接受任何治疗)、抗血小板组和抗凝剂组,抗血小板/抗凝剂的逆转按照美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会的现行指南进行。单因素分析中具有统计学意义的变量(p<0.05)被纳入多变量回归模型。
在接受微创脑出血手术治疗的 226 例患者中,41%(N=93)有抗血栓药物史;28%(N=64)接受抗血小板治疗,9%(N=21)接受抗凝治疗。接受两种治疗的患者(N=6)被排除在外。抗血小板组更常出现脑叶出血(56% vs. 37%;p=0.022),而抗凝组患者的伴发脑室内出血比例更高(62% vs. 46%;p=0.011)。尽管单因素分析显示抗血小板组术后血肿体积更大(3.9 毫升 vs. 2.9 毫升;p=0.020),清除率更低(88% vs. 92%;p=0.019),且抗凝组的手术时间更长(2.3 小时 vs. 1.7 小时;p=0.042),但多变量分析表明抗血小板和抗凝剂对这些技术结果没有显著影响。纵向来看,抗血栓药物与再出血发生率增加、出院回家频率降低、30 天死亡率降低或 6 个月改良 Rankin 量表评分恶化无关。
慢性抗血小板和抗凝患者表现出特征性的脑出血表型,但微创脑出血清除术后的技术和长期结果无恶化,提示该手术对这些患者是安全的。