• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预期寿命有限的患者中 DCIS 的过度治疗问题。

Potential Overtreatment of DCIS in Patients with Limited Life Expectancy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6812-6819. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15894-6. Epub 2024 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-15894-6
PMID:39031264
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As the benefits of intensive locoregional therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are realized over time in older adults, life expectancy may help to guide treatment decisions. We examined whether life expectancy was associated with extent of locoregional therapy in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women ≥ 70 years old with < 5 cm of DCIS diagnosed 2010-2015 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare dataset and categorized by a life expectancy ≤ 5 or > 5 years, defined by a validated claims-based measure. Differences in locoregional therapy (mastectomy + axillary surgery, mastectomy-only, lumpectomy + radiation therapy (RT) + axillary surgery, lumpectomy + RT, lumpectomy-only, and no treatment) by life expectancy were assessed using Pearson chi-squared tests. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify factors associated with receipt of lumpectomy-only.

RESULTS

Of 5346 women (median age of 75 years, range 70-97 years), 927 (17.3%) had a life expectancy ≤ 5 years. Of the 4041 patients who underwent lumpectomy, 710 (13.3%) underwent axillary surgery. More patients with life expectancy ≤ 5 years underwent lumpectomy-only (39.4% versus 27%), mastectomy-only (8.1% versus 5.3%), or no treatment (5.8% versus 3.2%; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, women with life expectancy ≤ 5 years had a significantly greater likelihood of undergoing lumpectomy-only [OR 1.90, 95% CI (1.63-2.22)].

CONCLUSIONS

Life expectancy is associated with lower-intensity locoregional therapy for older women with DCIS, yet a large proportion of patients with a life expectancy ≤ 5 years received RT and axillary surgery, highlighting potential overtreatment and opportunities to de-escalate locoregional therapy in older adults.

摘要

简介

随着强化局部区域治疗对导管原位癌(DCIS)的益处随着时间的推移在老年人中逐渐显现,预期寿命可能有助于指导治疗决策。我们研究了在这一人群中,预期寿命是否与局部区域治疗的范围有关。

方法

在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据集(SEER-Medicare dataset)中确定了 2010 年至 2015 年间诊断为<5cm 的 DCIS 且年龄≥70 岁的女性,并根据一种经过验证的基于索赔的测量方法,将预期寿命≤5 年或>5 年的患者分为两组。采用 Pearson 卡方检验比较两组间局部区域治疗(乳房切除术+腋窝手术、乳房切除术、乳房切除术+放疗+腋窝手术、乳房切除术+放疗、乳房切除术、单纯乳房切除术和无治疗)的差异。采用广义线性混合模型确定与接受单纯乳房切除术相关的因素。

结果

在 5346 名女性中(中位年龄 75 岁,范围 70-97 岁),927 名(17.3%)预期寿命≤5 年。在 4041 名接受乳房切除术的患者中,710 名(13.3%)接受了腋窝手术。预期寿命≤5 年的患者中,更多的患者接受了单纯乳房切除术(39.4%比 27%)、单纯乳房切除术(8.1%比 5.3%)或无治疗(5.8%比 3.2%;p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,预期寿命≤5 年的女性接受单纯乳房切除术的可能性显著增加[比值比 1.90,95%可信区间(1.63-2.22)]。

结论

预期寿命与老年 DCIS 患者局部区域治疗强度降低有关,但仍有很大一部分预期寿命≤5 年的患者接受了放疗和腋窝手术,这突出了过度治疗的潜在风险,也为老年患者局部区域治疗的降阶梯提供了机会。

相似文献

1
Potential Overtreatment of DCIS in Patients with Limited Life Expectancy.预期寿命有限的患者中 DCIS 的过度治疗问题。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6812-6819. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15894-6. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
2
Trends in Locoregional Therapy in Older Women with Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer by Frailty and Life Expectancy.按虚弱程度和预期寿命划分的老年早期激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者局部区域治疗趋势。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;31(2):920-930. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14446-8. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌的治疗趋势
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Mar 17;96(6):443-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh069.
4
Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.导管原位癌的治疗模式及预后趋势
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 30;107(12):djv263. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv263. Print 2015 Dec.
5
Association of Radiotherapy With Survival in Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Lumpectomy or Mastectomy.保乳术或乳房切除术治疗导管原位癌的女性中放疗与生存的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181100. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1100.
6
Patterns of treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in Louisiana, 1988-1999.1988 - 1999年路易斯安那州乳腺导管原位癌的治疗模式
J La State Med Soc. 2003 Jul-Aug;155(4):206-13.
7
Association of Regional Intensity of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment With Likelihood of Breast Preservation.区域导管原位癌治疗强度与保乳可能性的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):101-104. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2164.
8
Axillary evaluation and lymphedema in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.导管原位癌女性患者的腋窝评估与淋巴水肿
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;158(2):373-84. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3890-0. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
9
Assessment of treatment for patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast.乳腺原发性导管原位癌患者的治疗评估
Ann Surg Oncol. 1998 Dec;5(8):724-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02303484.
10
Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.导管原位癌诊断后的乳腺癌死亡率。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510.

本文引用的文献

1
SOUND (Sentinel Node Versus Observation After Axillary Ultrasound) Trial: Are We Ready to Change the Tune of Our Breast Cancer Practice?哨兵淋巴结超声引导下活检与观察对比(SOUND)试验:我们是否准备好改变乳腺癌治疗的策略?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3672-3674. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15111-4. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Trends in Locoregional Therapy in Older Women with Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer by Frailty and Life Expectancy.按虚弱程度和预期寿命划分的老年早期激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者局部区域治疗趋势。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;31(2):920-930. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14446-8. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes: The SOUND Randomized Clinical Trial.
前哨淋巴结活检与阴性超声腋窝淋巴结结果的小乳腺癌患者不进行腋窝手术的比较:SOUND 随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;9(11):1557-1564. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3759.
4
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2023.NCCN 指南®洞察:乳腺癌,第 4.2023 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Jun;21(6):594-608. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0031.
5
Association of Surgery With Frailty Status in Older Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌老年女性手术与衰弱状态的关联
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jun 1;158(6):664-666. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8146.
6
Avoiding Overtreatment of Women ≥70 With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Provider-Level Deimplementation Strategy.避免过度治疗 70 岁以上早期乳腺癌女性:一种提供者层面的去执行策略。
J Surg Res. 2023 Apr;284:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.072. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
7
Using Tailored Messages to Target Overuse of Low-Value Breast Cancer Care in Older Women.使用定制信息来针对老年女性过度使用低价值乳腺癌护理。
J Surg Res. 2022 Feb;270:503-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
8
Updated recommendations regarding the management of older patients with breast cancer: a joint paper from the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).关于老年乳腺癌患者管理的最新建议:欧洲乳腺肿瘤学会(EUSOMA)和国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)的联合文件。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):e327-e340. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30741-5. Epub 2021 May 14.
9
A medicare-based comparative mortality analysis of active surveillance in older women with DCIS.基于医疗保险的老年导管原位癌(DCIS)女性主动监测的比较死亡率分析。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Oct 30;6:57. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-00199-0. eCollection 2020.
10
Barriers and Facilitators to De-Implementation of the Choosing Wisely Guidelines for Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery.低价值乳腺癌手术“明智选择”指南去实施的障碍与促进因素
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;27(8):2653-2663. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08285-0. Epub 2020 Mar 2.