Department of Medicine, ABC Medical Center, Mexico City. CDMX, Emeritus, Mexico.
Division of Rheumatology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2024 Sep;46(9):1447-1454. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03399-6. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
Depending on its axis, pronation varies from the radius rotation around the steady ulna to the reciprocal adduction of the radius and abduction of the ulna. While there is no question that pronator teres is a central pronation agonist, anconeus's role is not settled. The current investigation comparing palpation and ultrasonography in these two muscles during pronation along the axis capitulum-second digit evolved from a serendipitous finding in a clinical anatomy seminar.
Single-hand palpation and two-transducer ultrasonography over anconeus and pronator teres were used on ten normal subjects to investigate their contraction during pronation around the capitulum-second digit axis. These studies were done independently and blind to the results of the other. The statistical analysis between palpation and ultrasonography was performed with Cohen's kappa coefficient and the χ2 test.
On palpation, on resisted full pronation, anconeus contracted in 8/10 subjects and pronator teres in 10/10 subjects. Without resistance, the corresponding ratios were 5/10 and 9/10. On two-transducer ultrasonography, the comparable ratios were 7/10 and 10/10, and 3/10 and 10/10. A fair concordance (Cohen's kappa = 0.21) between palpation and ultrasonography in detecting the simultaneous status of anconeus and pronator teres during resisted full pronation. Anatomic dissection illustrated the elements involved.
Plain palpation confirmed by ultrasonography showed the simultaneous contraction of anconeus and pronator teres during resisted pronation in most of the studied subjects. The study suggests that palpation can be helpful in directly studying muscle activity during movement.
根据其轴,旋前的变化范围从桡骨围绕稳定尺骨的旋转到桡骨的内收和尺骨的外展。虽然毫无疑问,旋前圆肌是一个主要的旋前肌激动剂,但肱三头肌的作用尚未确定。目前的研究通过对这些肌肉在沿肱骨小头-第二指轴旋前时的触诊和超声检查进行比较,是从临床解剖学研讨会上的一个偶然发现演变而来的。
在 10 名正常受试者中,使用单手触诊和双探头超声检查肱三头肌和旋前圆肌,以研究它们在沿肱骨小头-第二指轴旋前时的收缩情况。这些研究是独立进行的,对彼此的结果是盲的。触诊和超声检查之间的统计分析采用 Cohen's kappa 系数和 χ2 检验。
在抵抗完全旋前时,触诊时 8/10 例肱三头肌收缩,10/10 例旋前圆肌收缩。无阻力时,相应的比例分别为 5/10 和 9/10。在双探头超声检查中,可比比例分别为 7/10 和 10/10,3/10 和 10/10。触诊和超声检查在检测抵抗完全旋前时肱三头肌和旋前圆肌同时状态方面具有较好的一致性(Cohen's kappa = 0.21)。解剖学解剖说明了所涉及的要素。
超声证实的单纯触诊显示,在大多数研究对象中,抵抗旋前时肱三头肌和旋前圆肌同时收缩。该研究表明,触诊可有助于直接研究运动过程中的肌肉活动。