• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项全国性网络/邮件调查的受访者中,是什么因素预测了他们参与后续小组研究的意愿?

What predicts willingness to participate in a follow-up panel study among respondents to a national web/mail survey?

作者信息

Saw Htay-Wah, West Brady T, Couper Mick P, Axinn William G

机构信息

Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Field methods. 2024 Aug;36(3):206-212. doi: 10.1177/1525822x231193311. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1177/1525822x231193311
PMID:39045038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11262570/
Abstract

The American Family Health Study (AFHS) collected family health and fertility data from a national probability sample of persons aged 18-49 between September 2021 and May 2022, using web and mail exclusively. In July 2022, we surveyed AFHS respondents and gauged their willingness to become part of a national web panel that would create novel longitudinal data on these topics. We focus on predictors of willingness to participate, identifying the potential selection bias that this type of approach may introduce. We found that efforts of this type to create a national web panel may introduce potential selection bias in estimates based on the panel respondents, with individuals having higher socio-economic status being more cooperative. Thus, alternative recruitment strategies and re-weighting of the subsample may be needed to further reduce selection bias. We present methodological implications of our results, limitations of our approach, and suggestions for further research on this topic.

摘要

美国家庭健康研究(AFHS)于2021年9月至2022年5月期间,通过网络和邮件方式,从全国18至49岁人群的概率样本中收集了家庭健康和生育数据。2022年7月,我们对AFHS的受访者进行了调查,评估他们参与全国网络小组的意愿,该小组将创建有关这些主题的全新纵向数据。我们重点关注参与意愿的预测因素,识别这种方法可能引入的潜在选择偏差。我们发现,创建全国网络小组的此类努力可能会在基于小组受访者的估计中引入潜在选择偏差,社会经济地位较高的个体更具合作性。因此,可能需要采用替代招募策略并对子样本进行重新加权,以进一步减少选择偏差。我们阐述了研究结果的方法学意义、我们方法的局限性以及对该主题进一步研究的建议。

相似文献

1
What predicts willingness to participate in a follow-up panel study among respondents to a national web/mail survey?在一项全国性网络/邮件调查的受访者中,是什么因素预测了他们参与后续小组研究的意愿?
Field methods. 2024 Aug;36(3):206-212. doi: 10.1177/1525822x231193311. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Incorporating Adaptive Survey Design in a Two-Stage National Web or Mail Mixed-Mode Survey: An Experiment in the American Family Health Study.将适应性调查设计纳入两阶段全国性网络或邮件混合模式调查:美国家庭健康研究中的一项实验
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2023 Sep 12;12(3):578-592. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smad035. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.网络自评健康与混合模式调查中邮件自评健康的比较:数字鸿沟效应与真实调查模式效应。
Med Care. 2013 Sep;51(9):774-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829a4f92.
4
Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys.环境健康研究中的自我报告数据:邮件调查与网络调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0882-x.
5
An Experimental Evaluation of Two Approaches for Improving Response to Household Screening Efforts in National Mail/Web Surveys.两种提高国家邮件/网络调查中家庭筛查工作回应率方法的实验评估
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2022 Jul 12;11(1):124-140. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smac024. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Data collection in pandemic times: the case of the Belgian COVID-19 health surveys.疫情期间的数据收集:比利时新冠健康调查案例
Arch Public Health. 2023 Jul 4;81(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01135-x.
7
Communicating disclosure risk in informed consent statements.在知情同意声明中传达披露风险。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):1-8. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.1.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
9
An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours.评价倾向评分调整是否可以消除针对敏感健康行为的网络面板调查中固有的选择偏差。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01134-4.
10
Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.公众对参与医学研究的意愿所持的态度。
J Health Soc Policy. 2000;12(2):23-43. doi: 10.1300/J045v12n02_02.

本文引用的文献

1
Visible Cash, a Second Incentive, and Priority Mail? An Experimental Evaluation of Mailing Strategies for a Screening Questionnaire in a National Push-to-Web/Mail Survey.可见现金、第二种激励措施和优先邮件?一项针对全国性网络/邮件推送调查中筛查问卷邮寄策略的实验评估。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2023 Feb 22;11(5):1011-1031. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smac041. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States.提高全国性自我管理网络/邮件调查参与率的方法:来自美国的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 4;18(8):e0289695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289695. eCollection 2023.
3
An Experimental Evaluation of Two Approaches for Improving Response to Household Screening Efforts in National Mail/Web Surveys.两种提高国家邮件/网络调查中家庭筛查工作回应率方法的实验评估
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2022 Jul 12;11(1):124-140. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smac024. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Dimensions of Reproductive Attitudes and Knowledge Related to Unintended Childbearing Among U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults.美国青少年和年轻成年人与意外怀孕相关的生殖态度和知识维度。
Demography. 2019 Feb;56(1):201-228. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0747-7.