Suppr超能文献

开展药物评估以改善阿鲁巴医疗保健系统:一项混合方法试点研究。

Developing Medication Reviews to Improve the Aruban Healthcare System: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

作者信息

Copinga Minke L, Kok Ellen A, van Dam Anke J J, Wever Anoeska, Tromp Adrienne, Woerdenbag Herman J

机构信息

Pharmacy Master Programme, School of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

Pharos, Expertise Center on Health Disparities, Arthur van Schendelstraat 600, 3511 MJ Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;12(4):108. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12040108.

Abstract

This study investigated whether and how medication reviews (MRs) conducted by pharmacists and general practitioners (GPs) with patient involvement can be performed on the island of Aruba (Dutch Caribbean). In this mixed-methods pilot study (both qualitative and quantitative), constructive and observational methodologies were combined. Healthcare providers' and patients' views on MRs and aspects of Aruban healthcare and culture relevant to MRs were examined. These insights were used to develop a protocol for conducting and implementing MRs in Aruba. Surveys were distributed and semi-structured interviews were held among Aruban community pharmacists and GPs, and a pilot program was created in which MRs were carried out with four Aruban patients and their GPs. According to the included healthcare providers, the main purpose of MRs is to optimize the patient experience and achieve concordance. Even though pharmacists and GPs consider their partnership equal, they have different views as to who should bear which responsibility in the MR process in matters regarding patient selection and follow-up. Common Aruban themes that were mentioned by the healthcare providers and deemed relevant for conducting MRs included behaviour/culture, healthcare, lifestyle, and therapy compliance. Anamnesis should be concise during the MR, and questions about medication storage, concerns, beliefs, and practical problems, as well as checks for limited health literacy, were considered important. In the pilot, at least three to, maximally, eight pharmacotherapy-related problems (PRPs) were detected per MR consultation, such as an incorrect dosage of acetylsalicylic acid, an inappropriate combination tablet for blood pressure regulation, and the absence of important laboratory values. All patients considered their consultation to be positive and of added value. In addition, it was observed that an MR can potentially generate cost savings. The information obtained from the healthcare providers and patients, together with the basic principles for MRs, as applied in the Netherlands, led to a definitive and promising MR format with practical recommendations for community pharmacists in Aruba: in comparison with the Dutch MR approach, GPs and pharmacists in Aruba could collaborate more on patient selection for MRs and their follow-up, because of their specific knowledge regarding the medications patients are taking chronically (pharmacists), and possible low levels of health literacy (GPs). Taking into account the Aruban culture, pharmacists could ask extra questions during MRs, referring to lifestyle (high prevalence of obesity), readability of medication labels (limited literacy), and herbal product use (Latin American culture). GPs and medical specialists sometimes experience miscommunication regarding the prescription of medication, which means that pharmacists must carefully take into account possible duplicate medications or interactions.

摘要

本研究调查了在阿鲁巴岛(荷属加勒比地区),药剂师和全科医生(GP)在患者参与下进行的用药评估(MR)是否可行以及如何实施。在这项混合方法的试点研究(包括定性和定量研究)中,将建设性和观察性方法结合起来。研究考察了医疗保健提供者和患者对用药评估以及阿鲁巴医疗保健和文化中与用药评估相关方面的看法。这些见解被用于制定在阿鲁巴进行和实施用药评估的方案。对阿鲁巴社区药剂师和全科医生进行了问卷调查并开展了半结构化访谈,并创建了一个试点项目,对四名阿鲁巴患者及其全科医生进行用药评估。根据参与研究的医疗保健提供者的说法,用药评估的主要目的是优化患者体验并达成一致性。尽管药剂师和全科医生认为他们的合作关系是平等的,但在患者选择和后续跟进等用药评估过程中,对于谁应承担何种责任,他们有不同的看法。医疗保健提供者提到的、被认为与进行用药评估相关的阿鲁巴常见主题包括行为/文化、医疗保健、生活方式和治疗依从性。在用药评估期间,问诊应简洁明了,关于药物储存、担忧、信念和实际问题的询问,以及对健康素养有限情况的检查,都被认为很重要。在试点中,每次用药评估咨询至少检测到三至八个与药物治疗相关的问题(PRP),例如乙酰水杨酸剂量不正确、用于血压调节的复方片剂不合适以及重要实验室值缺失。所有患者都认为他们参与的咨询是积极且有价值的。此外,观察到用药评估有可能节省成本。从医疗保健提供者和患者那里获得的信息,以及在荷兰应用的用药评估基本原则,促成了一种明确且有前景的用药评估形式,并为阿鲁巴的社区药剂师提供了实用建议:与荷兰的用药评估方法相比,阿鲁巴的全科医生和药剂师在用药评估的患者选择及其后续跟进方面可以加强合作,因为药剂师对患者长期服用的药物有专业知识,而全科医生可能了解患者健康素养水平较低的情况。考虑到阿鲁巴的文化,药剂师在用药评估期间可以额外询问一些问题,涉及生活方式(肥胖患病率高)、药物标签的可读性(识字率有限)和草药产品使用情况(拉丁美洲文化)。全科医生和医学专家有时在药物处方方面存在沟通不畅的问题,这意味着药剂师必须仔细考虑可能的重复用药或相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea8/11270182/038a6aad28a2/pharmacy-12-00108-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验