Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Eugeniavägen 3, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec;34(4):929-937. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01439-7. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
Cone-beam CT in the interventional suite could be an alternative to CT to shorten door-to-thrombectomy time. However, image quality in cone-beam CT is limited by artifacts and poor differentiation between gray and white matter. This study compared non-contrast brain dual-layer cone-beam CT in the interventional suite to reference standard CT in stroke patients.
A prospective single-center study enrolled consecutive participants with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The hemorrhage detection accuracy, per-region ASPECTS accuracy and subjective image quality (Likert scales for gray-white matter differentiation, structure perception and artifacts) were assessed by three neuroradiologists blinded to clinical data on dual-layer cone-beam CT 75 keV monoenergetic images compared to CT. Objective image quality was assessed by region-of-interest metrics. Non-inferiority for hemorrhage detection and ASPECTS accuracy was determined by the exact binomial test with a one-sided lower performance boundary prospectively set to 80% (98.75% CI).
27 participants were included (74 years ± 9; 19 female) in the hyperacute or acute stroke phase. One reader missed a small bleeding, but all hemorrhages were detected in the majority analysis (100% accuracy, CI lower boundary 86%, p = 0.002). ASPECTS majority analysis showed 90% accuracy (CI lower boundary 85%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity was 66% (individual readers 67%, 69%, and 76%), specificity was 97% (97%, 96%, 89%). Subjective and objective image quality were inferior to CT.
In a small single-center cohort, dual-layer cone-beam CT showed non-inferior hemorrhage detection and ASPECTS accuracy to CT. Despite inferior image quality, the technique may be useful for stroke evaluation in the interventional suite.
NCT04571099 (clinicaltrials.gov). Prospectively registered 2020-09-04.
介入套房中的锥形束 CT 可能是缩短门到溶栓时间的 CT 替代方法。然而,锥形束 CT 的图像质量受到伪影和灰白质区分不良的限制。本研究比较了介入套房中非对比脑双层锥形束 CT 与中风患者的参考标准 CT。
一项前瞻性单中心研究纳入了连续的缺血性或出血性中风患者。三位神经放射科医生对双层锥形束 CT 75keV 单能图像的脑出血检测准确性、各区域 ASPECTS 准确性和主观图像质量(用于灰白质区分、结构感知和伪影的李克特量表)进行评估,这些医生对双层锥形束 CT 75keV 单能图像的临床数据不知情。通过感兴趣区域指标评估客观图像质量。通过精确二项式检验确定出血检测和 ASPECTS 准确性的非劣效性,单侧下性能边界前瞻性设定为 80%(98.75%CI)。
27 名参与者(74 岁±9;19 名女性)处于超急性期或急性期。一位读者错过了一个小出血,但在多数分析中所有出血均被检测到(100%的准确率,CI 下限 86%,p=0.002)。ASPECTS 多数分析显示 90%的准确率(CI 下限 85%,p<0.001)。敏感性为 66%(个别读者为 67%、69%和 76%),特异性为 97%(97%、96%和 89%)。主观和客观图像质量均劣于 CT。
在一个小的单中心队列中,双层锥形束 CT 显示出与 CT 相比非劣的出血检测和 ASPECTS 准确性。尽管图像质量较差,但该技术可能对介入套房中的中风评估有用。
NCT04571099(clinicaltrials.gov)。2020 年 9 月 4 日前瞻性注册。