• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用ChatGPT进行系统评价:教程

Using ChatGPT to perform a systematic review: a tutorial.

作者信息

Teperikidis Lefteris, Boulmpou Aristi, Papadopoulos Christodoulos, Biondi-Zoccai Giuseppe

机构信息

Third Department of Cardiology, Ippokratio General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece -

Clinical Research Unit, Special Unit for Biomedical Research and Education (SUBRE), School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece -

出版信息

Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2024 Dec;72(6):547-567. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06568-2. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

DOI:10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06568-2
PMID:39056432
Abstract

This tutorial provides a comprehensive guide on leveraging ChatGPT for systematic literature reviews, leveraging actual applications in cardiovascular research. Systematic reviews, while essential, are resource-intensive, and ChatGPT offers a potential solution to streamline the process. The tutorial covers the entire review process, from preparation to finalization. In the preparation phase, ChatGPT assists in defining research questions and generating search strings. During the screening phase, ChatGPT can efficiently screen titles and abstracts, processing multiple abstracts simultaneously. The tutorial also introduces an intermediate step of generating study summaries that leads to the generation of reliable data extraction tables. For assessing the risk of bias, ChatGPT can be prompted to perform these tasks. Using each tool's explanation document to generate an appropriate prompt is an efficient method of reliable risk of bias assessments using ChatGPT. However, users are cautioned about potential hallucinations in ChatGPT's outputs and the importance of manual validation. The tutorial emphasizes the need for vigilance, continuous refinement, and gaining experience with ChatGPT to ensure accurate and reliable results. The methods presented have been successfully tried in several projects, but they remain in nascent stages, with ample room for improvement and refinement.

摘要

本教程提供了一份全面指南,介绍如何利用ChatGPT进行系统文献综述,并展示了其在心血管研究中的实际应用。系统综述虽然至关重要,但资源消耗大,而ChatGPT为简化这一过程提供了一种可能的解决方案。该教程涵盖了从准备到完成的整个综述过程。在准备阶段,ChatGPT协助定义研究问题并生成检索词。在筛选阶段,ChatGPT能够高效地筛选标题和摘要,同时处理多篇摘要。本教程还引入了生成研究总结的中间步骤,这有助于生成可靠的数据提取表。对于评估偏倚风险,可促使ChatGPT执行这些任务。利用每个工具的解释文档来生成合适的提示,是使用ChatGPT进行可靠偏倚风险评估的有效方法。然而,需提醒用户注意ChatGPT输出中可能出现的幻觉以及人工验证的重要性。本教程强调了保持警惕、持续完善以及积累使用ChatGPT经验的必要性,以确保结果准确可靠。所介绍的方法已在多个项目中成功尝试,但仍处于初期阶段,有很大的改进和完善空间。

相似文献

1
Using ChatGPT to perform a systematic review: a tutorial.使用ChatGPT进行系统评价:教程
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2024 Dec;72(6):547-567. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06568-2. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
[Human vs. ChatGPT. Is it possible obtain comparable results in the analysis of a scientific systematic review?].[人类与ChatGPT。在科学系统评价分析中有可能获得可比结果吗?]
Recenti Prog Med. 2024 Sep;115(9):420-425. doi: 10.1701/4334.43184.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
ChatGPT's performance in German OB/GYN exams - paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice.ChatGPT在德国妇产科考试中的表现——为人工智能强化医学教育和临床实践铺平道路。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 13;10:1296615. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1296615. eCollection 2023.
5
ChatGPT's Attitude, Knowledge, and Clinical Application in Geriatrics Practice and Education: Exploratory Observational Study.ChatGPT在老年医学实践与教育中的态度、知识及临床应用:探索性观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 3;9:e63494. doi: 10.2196/63494.
6
Optimizing ChatGPT's Interpretation and Reporting of Delirium Assessment Outcomes: Exploratory Study.优化 ChatGPT 对谵妄评估结果的解释和报告:探索性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 1;8:e51383. doi: 10.2196/51383.
7
Methodological insights into ChatGPT's screening performance in systematic reviews.对 ChatGPT 在系统评价中的筛选性能的方法学洞察。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02203-8.
8
ChatGPT prompts for generating multiple-choice questions in medical education and evidence on their validity: a literature review.ChatGPT 提示在医学教育中生成多项选择题及其有效性的证据:文献综述。
Postgrad Med J. 2024 Oct 18;100(1189):858-865. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgae065.
9
How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment.ChatGPT在美国医师执照考试(USMLE)中的表现如何?大语言模型对医学教育和知识评估的影响。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Feb 8;9:e45312. doi: 10.2196/45312.
10
Comprehensive evaluation of molecule property prediction with ChatGPT.ChatGPT 进行分子性质预测的综合评估。
Methods. 2024 Feb;222:133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.01.004. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of The Umbrella Collaboration for Tertiary Evidence Synthesis in Geriatrics: Mixed Methods Study.老年医学三级证据综合的伞状合作验证:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 8;9:e75215. doi: 10.2196/75215.
2
Effectiveness of The Umbrella Collaboration Versus Traditional Umbrella Reviews for Evidence Synthesis in Health Care: Protocol for a Validation Study.伞形合作与传统伞形综述在医疗保健证据综合中的有效性:一项验证研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 14;14:e67248. doi: 10.2196/67248.
3
Pre-operative antibiotics in patients with acute mild cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it really useful? A systematic review.
急性轻度胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术前使用抗生素:真的有用吗?一项系统评价。
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x.