A Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Approach Proposal for Huge Hepatocellular Carcinomas Exceeding 10 cm in Diameter.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The outcome of hepatectomy for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeding 10 cm (i.e., huge HCC) remains unfavorable. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the optimal therapeutic approach for huge HCCs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2018, patients with a huge HCC who underwent treatment at our institution were enrolled. Cases not meeting the criteria (Child-Pugh grade A or performance status 0/1) and patients with distant metastases were excluded. Patients were stratified into three groups: a) upfront hepatectomy (Upfront); b) hepatectomy subsequent to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC-Hr); and c) HAIC alone (HAIC). Survival rates, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were analyzed. The cancer-specific mortality attributed to recurrence within one year after surgery was defined as "futile surgery"; the rate of futile surgery was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 70 cases were censored (Upfront/HAIC-Hr/HAIC: 28/13/29). The 5-year PFS and OS rates for Upfront, HAIC-Hr, and HAIC were 7.7%, 69.2%, and 6.9%, and 37.1%, 79.1%, and 19.7%, respectively. The number of futile surgeries was 6 (21.4%) in the Upfront group, whereas no such cases occurred in the HAIC-Hr group.

CONCLUSION

Although hepatectomy was advocated in the Upfront group due to the potential resectability, the outcomes were comparable to those of the HAIC group. Conversely, the HAIC-Hr group had promising outcomes, marked by a decreased prevalence of futile surgeries. Huge HCCs should be regarded as borderline resectable, even when deemed potentially resectable. Therefore, a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach might be reasonable.