• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导管定植患者与发生中心静脉导管相关血流感染患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管留置时间的差异:一项单中心回顾性队列研究

Differences in the Dwell Time of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters between Patients with Catheter Colonization and Those Developing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Pitiriga Vassiliki C, Campos Elsa, Bakalis John, Saroglou George, Tsakris Athanasios

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Street, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Department of Internal Medicine, Metropolitan Hospital, 9 Ethnarchou Makariou Street, 18547 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jul 8;13(7):632. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13070632.

DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13070632
PMID:39061314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11273596/
Abstract

Substantial knowledge gaps exist concerning the varying durations of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placements that lead to either central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) or catheter colonization. We aimed to compare PICCs dwell time between patients who developed CLABSIs due to multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) and patients with catheter colonization by MDROs. Data from 86 patients admitted consecutively to a tertiary-care hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dwell time was 25.73 ± 16.19 days in the PICC-CLABSI group and 16.36 ± 10.28 days in the PICC-colonization group ( = 0.002). The mean dwell time was 17.38 ± 9.5 days in the PICC-MDRO group and 22.48 ± 15.64 days in the PICC-non-MDRO group ( = 0.005). Within the PICC-CLABSI group, the mean dwell time for CLABSIs caused by MDROs was 21.50 ± 12.31 days, compared to 27.73 ± 16.98 days for CLABSIs caused by non-MDROs ( = 0.417). Within the PICC-colonization group, the mean dwell time was 15.55 ± 7.73 days in PICCs colonized by MDROs and 16.92 ± 11.85 days in PICCs colonized by non-MDROs ( = 0.124). The findings of the present study suggest that CLABSIs caused by MDROs in PICCs are associated with a shorter mean catheter dwell time compared to those caused by non-MDROs, underscoring the importance of considering infections by MDROs when evaluating PICC dwell times.

摘要

关于外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)留置不同时长导致中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)或导管定植,目前存在相当大的知识空白。我们旨在比较因多重耐药微生物(MDRO)导致CLABSI的患者与MDRO导管定植患者之间的PICC留置时间。对2017年至2020年连续入住一家三级医院的86例患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。PICC-CLABSI组的平均留置时间为25.73±16.19天,PICC定植组为16.36±10.28天(P = 0.002)。PICC-MDRO组的平均留置时间为17.38±9.5天,PICC非MDRO组为22.48±15.64天(P = 0.005)。在PICC-CLABSI组中,MDRO引起的CLABSI平均留置时间为21.50±12.31天,而非MDRO引起的CLABSI为27.73±16.98天(P = 0.417)。在PICC定植组中,MDRO定植的PICC平均留置时间为15.55±7.73天,非MDRO定植的PICC为16.92±11.85天(P = 0.124)。本研究结果表明,与非MDRO引起的CLABSI相比,PICC中MDRO引起的CLABSI与较短的平均导管留置时间相关,这突出了在评估PICC留置时间时考虑MDRO感染的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6259/11273596/d57fa9898abe/antibiotics-13-00632-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6259/11273596/d57fa9898abe/antibiotics-13-00632-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6259/11273596/d57fa9898abe/antibiotics-13-00632-g001a.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in the Dwell Time of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters between Patients with Catheter Colonization and Those Developing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.导管定植患者与发生中心静脉导管相关血流感染患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管留置时间的差异:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jul 8;13(7):632. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13070632.
2
Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients.与中心静脉导管相比,外周静脉置入中心静脉导管在危重症患者中降低血流感染风险。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Nov 9;11(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1.
3
Central Venous Catheters versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A Comparison of Indwelling Time Resulting in Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens.中心静脉导管与经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的比较:耐多药病原体定植导致的留置时间对比
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 17;13(1):89. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010089.
4
Catheter dwell time and CLABSIs in neonates with PICCs: a multicenter cohort study.经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)新生儿的导管留置时间与 CLABSIs:一项多中心队列研究。
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):e1609-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1645. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters.中心静脉导管与经外周中心静脉置管的微生物定植率比较。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Aug 7;12(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1.
6
Central line-associated bloodstream infection in hospitalized children with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: extending risk analyses outside the intensive care unit.中心静脉导管相关血流感染在使用外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的住院患儿中的研究:将风险分析扩展至重症监护病房之外。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):1108-1115. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir145.
7
Does the antimicrobial-impregnated peripherally inserted central catheter decrease the CLABSI rate in neonates? Results from a retrospective cohort study.抗菌涂层外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管能否降低新生儿中心静脉导管相关血流感染率?一项回顾性队列研究的结果。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 24;10:1012800. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1012800. eCollection 2022.
8
Peripherally inserted central catheter-associated bloodstream infection: Risk factors and the role of antibiotic-impregnated catheters for prevention.外周置入中心静脉导管相关性血流感染:危险因素和抗生素涂层导管预防作用。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Feb;47(2):191-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
9
Line days as a determinant of central line-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric patients with tunneled femoral peripherally inserted central catheters.隧道式股外周置入中心静脉导管的儿科患者中,留置天数是中心静脉相关血流感染的决定因素。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Jul;51(8):1481-1486. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05019-6. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
10
Dwell time and risk of central-line-associated bloodstream infection in neonates.新生儿留置时间与中心静脉导管相关血流感染的风险。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Nov;97(3):267-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical Device-Associated Biofilm Infections and Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens.医疗器械相关生物膜感染与多重耐药病原体
Pathogens. 2024 May 8;13(5):393. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13050393.
2
Central Venous Catheters versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A Comparison of Indwelling Time Resulting in Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens.中心静脉导管与经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的比较:耐多药病原体定植导致的留置时间对比
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 17;13(1):89. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010089.
3
Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance and Multidrug Resistance Prevalence of Clinical Isolates in a Regional Hospital in Northern Greece.
希腊北部一家地区医院临床分离株的抗菌药物耐药性和多重耐药性流行情况监测
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Nov 5;12(11):1595. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12111595.
4
Bloodstream Infections Caused by Multidrug Resistant Bacteria: Clinical and Microbiological Features and Mortality.多重耐药菌引起的血流感染:临床和微生物学特征及死亡率
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2023 Sep 29;57(3):416-425. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2023.31697. eCollection 2023.
5
Regulation of biofilm formation in .……中生物膜形成的调控 。 (你提供的原文不完整,“in”后面缺少具体内容)
Front Microbiol. 2023 Sep 7;14:1238482. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1238482. eCollection 2023.
6
Clinical Impacts and Risk Factors for Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review.中心静脉导管相关血流感染的临床影响及危险因素:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Jun 25;15(6):e40954. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40954. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies.了解细菌生物膜:从定义到治疗策略。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Apr 6;13:1137947. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1137947. eCollection 2023.
8
Risk factors of catheter- associated bloodstream infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis.导管相关血流感染的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0282290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282290. eCollection 2023.
9
Horizontal Gene Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Biofilms.生物膜中抗生素抗性基因的水平基因转移
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;12(2):328. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020328.
10
Clinical factors associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) related bloodstream infections: a single centre retrospective cohort.与经外周中心静脉置管(PICC)相关血流感染相关的临床因素:单中心回顾性队列研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Jan 30;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01209-z.