Gómez-Peralta Fernando, Valledor Xoan, Abreu Cristina, Fernández-Rubio Elsa, Cotovad Laura, Pujante Pedro, Azriel Sharona, Pérez-González Jesús, Vallejo Alba, Ruiz-Valdepeñas Luis, Corcoy Rosa
Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital General de Segovia, Luis Erik Clavería Neurólogo S.N Street, 40002 Segovia, Spain.
Research and Development Unit, Insulcloud S.L., 28020 Madrid, Spain.
Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 18;12(7):1600. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071600.
A study to assess the glucose levels of people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) overnight, based on the insulin type and timing.
A real-world, retrospective study of T1D, using multiple daily insulin injections. Continuous glucose monitoring and insulin injection data were collected for ten hours after dinner using the connected cap. Meal events were identified using the ROC detection methodology. The timing of the rapid insulin, second injections, and the type of insulin analogs used, were evaluated.
The nocturnal profiles (n = 775, 49 subjects) were analyzed. A higher glucose AUC of over 180 mg/dL was observed in subjects with delayed injections (number; %; mg/dL × h): -45-15 min (n = 136; 17.5%, 175.9 ± 271.0); -15-0 min (n = 231; 29.8%, 164.0 ± 2 37.1); 0 + 45 min (n = 408; 52.6%, 203.6 ± 260.9), ( = 0.049). The use of ultrarapid insulin (FiAsp) (URI) vs. rapid insulin (RI) analogs was associated with less hypoglycemia events (7.1 vs. 13.6%; = 0.005) and TBR70 (1.7 ± 6.9 vs. 4.6 ± 13.9%; = 0.003). Users of glargine U300 vs. degludec had a higher TIR (70.7 vs. 58.5%) (adjusted R-squared: 0.22, < 0.001). The use of a correction injection (n = 144, 18.6%) was associated with a higher number of hypoglycemia events (18.1 vs. 9.5%; = 0.003), TBR70 (5.5 ± 14.2 vs. 3.0 ± 11.1%; = 0.003), a glucose AUC of over 180 mg/dL (226.1 ± 257.8 vs. 178.0 ± 255.3 mg/dL × h; = 0.001), and a lower TIR (56.0 ± 27.4 vs. 62.7 ± 29.6 mg/dL × h; = 0.004).
The dinner rapid insulin timing, insulin type, and the use of correction injections affect the nocturnal glucose profile in T1D.
一项基于胰岛素类型和注射时间来评估1型糖尿病(T1D)患者夜间血糖水平的研究。
一项针对T1D的真实世界回顾性研究,采用每日多次胰岛素注射。使用连接帽在晚餐后收集连续十小时的血糖监测和胰岛素注射数据。使用ROC检测方法识别进餐事件。评估速效胰岛素、第二次注射的时间以及所用胰岛素类似物的类型。
分析了夜间血糖曲线(n = 775,49名受试者)。在注射延迟的受试者中观察到较高的血糖曲线下面积(AUC)超过180mg/dL(数量;%;mg/dL×小时):-45至-15分钟(n = 136;17.5%,175.9±271.0);-15至0分钟(n = 231;29.8%,164.0±237.1);0至45分钟(n = 408;52.6%,203.6±260.9),(P = 0.049)。使用超短效胰岛素(FiAsp)(URI)与速效胰岛素(RI)类似物相比,低血糖事件较少(7.1%对13.6%;P = 0.005)且TBR70较低(1.7±6.9%对4.6±13.9%;P = 0.003)。甘精胰岛素U300与德谷胰岛素的使用者相比,有更高的血糖达标时间(TIR)(70.7%对58.5%)(调整后的R平方:0.22,P < 0.001)。使用校正注射(n = 144,18.6%)与更多的低血糖事件(18.1%对9.5%;P = 0.003)、TBR70(5.5±14.2%对3.0±11.1%;P = 0.003)、血糖AUC超过180mg/dL(226.1±257.8对178.0±255.3mg/dL×小时;P = 0.001)以及更低的TIR(56.0±27.4对62.7±29.6mg/dL×小时;P = 0.004)相关。
晚餐时速效胰岛素的注射时间、胰岛素类型以及校正注射的使用会影响T1D患者的夜间血糖曲线。