Martinez Flores Danaë, Akhoundova Dilara, Seipel Katja, Legros Myriam, Kronig Marie-Noelle, Daskalakis Michael, Bacher Ulrike, Pabst Thomas
Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Berne, Switzerland.
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Center for Laboratory Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Berne, Switzerland.
Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 19;12(7):1616. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071616.
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a CD33-targeting antibody drug conjugate, previously showed longer relapse-free survival when combined with induction chemotherapy in patients with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this patient population, characterized by lower relapse risk as compared to other ELN risk groups, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be used as consolidation strategy. However, there are limited data on the impact of GO on the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization potential. We therefore retrospectively analyzed data from 54 AML patients with favorable-risk AML treated with ( = 17) or without ( = 37) GO during induction treatment. We observed no significant differences in the PBSC mobilization rate between patients treated with vs. without GO. The mobilization success in a first attempt directly following cycle 2 was 65% vs. 70% ( = 0.92); and the mobilization success in a subsequent second attempt after hematologic recovery and repeated stimulation procedure was 24% vs. 19% ( = 0.56). No significant impact on treatment outcome in terms of EFS ( = 0.31) or OS ( = 0.99) was observed. Thus, our results suggest that the addition of GO to induction regimens does not negatively impact PBSC mobilization in favorable-risk AML patients. To our best knowledge, this is the first study comparing the stem cell mobilization potential in favorable-risk AML patients treated with vs. without GO.
吉妥珠单抗奥唑米星(GO)是一种靶向CD33的抗体药物偶联物,先前研究表明,在低危急性髓系白血病(AML)患者中,与诱导化疗联合使用时,其无复发生存期更长。在该患者群体中,与其他欧洲白血病网络(ELN)风险组相比,复发风险较低,自体干细胞移植(ASCT)可作为巩固治疗策略。然而,关于GO对外周血干细胞(PBSC)动员潜力影响的数据有限。因此,我们回顾性分析了54例低危AML患者的数据,这些患者在诱导治疗期间接受了GO治疗(n = 17)或未接受GO治疗(n = 37)。我们观察到,接受GO治疗与未接受GO治疗的患者在PBSC动员率上没有显著差异。在第2周期后直接进行的首次动员成功率分别为65%和70%(P = 0.92);在血液学恢复和重复刺激程序后的后续第二次动员成功率分别为24%和19%(P = 0.56)。在无事件生存期(EFS,P = 0.31)或总生存期(OS,P = 0.99)方面,未观察到对治疗结果有显著影响。因此,我们的结果表明,在诱导方案中添加GO不会对低危AML患者的PBSC动员产生负面影响。据我们所知,这是第一项比较接受和未接受GO治疗的低危AML患者干细胞动员潜力的研究。