Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China (L.S., H.X., Q.L., Y.Y., Z.Y., L.W.).
United Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, Beijing 100050, China (D.Y.).
Acad Radiol. 2024 Dec;31(12):5022-5033. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.06.048. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
To evaluate the image quality and PI-RADS scoring performance of prostate T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) based on AI-assisted compressed sensing (ACS).
In this prospective study, adult male urological outpatients or inpatients underwent prostate MRI, including T2WI, diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient maps. Three accelerated scanning protocols using parallel imaging (PI) and ACS: T2WI, T2WI and T2WI were evaluated through comparative analysis. Quantitative analysis included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), slope profile, and edge rise distance (ERD). Image quality was qualitatively assessed using a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = non-diagnostic to 5 = excellent). PI-RADS scores were determined for the largest or most suspicious lesions in each patient. The Friedman test and one-way ANOVA with post hoc tests were utilized for group comparisons, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.
This study included 40 participants. Compared to PI, ACS reduced acquisition time by over 50%, significantly enhancing the CNR of sagittal and axial T2WI (P < 0.05), significantly improving the image quality of sagittal and axial T2WI (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in slope profile, ERD, and PI-RADS scores between groups (P > 0.05).
ACS reduced prostate T2WI acquisition time by half while improving image quality without affecting PI-RADS scores.
评估基于人工智能辅助压缩感知(ACS)的前列腺 T2 加权成像(T2WI)的图像质量和 PI-RADS 评分性能。
在这项前瞻性研究中,成年男性泌尿科门诊或住院患者接受了前列腺 MRI 检查,包括 T2WI、弥散加权成像和表观弥散系数图。通过对比分析,评估了三种使用并行成像(PI)和 ACS 的加速扫描方案:T2WI、T2WI 和 T2WI。定量分析包括信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、斜率轮廓和边缘上升距离(ERD)。使用五点 Likert 量表(范围从 1=无诊断价值到 5=极好)对图像质量进行定性评估。为每位患者的最大或最可疑病灶确定 PI-RADS 评分。采用 Friedman 检验和单因素方差分析(事后检验)进行组间比较,以 P<0.05 为统计学显著性标准。
这项研究共纳入 40 名参与者。与 PI 相比,ACS 将采集时间缩短了 50%以上,显著提高了矢状位和轴位 T2WI 的 CNR(P<0.05),显著改善了矢状位和轴位 T2WI 的图像质量(P<0.05)。组间斜率轮廓、ERD 和 PI-RADS 评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。
ACS 将前列腺 T2WI 的采集时间缩短了一半,同时提高了图像质量,而不影响 PI-RADS 评分。