Patterns of molecular evolution in a parthenogenic terrestrial isopod ().

The "paradox of sex" refers to the question of why sexual reproduction is maintained in the wild, despite how costly it is compared to asexual reproduction. Because of these costs, one might expect nature to select for asexual reproduction, yet sex seems to be continually selected for. Multiple hypotheses have been proposed to explain this incongruence, including the niche differentiation hypothesis, the Red Queen hypothesis, and accumulation of harmful mutations in asexual species due to inefficient purifying selection. This study focuses on the accumulation of mutations in two terrestrial isopods, , which has sexual diploid and parthenogenic triploid forms, and , an obligately sexual relative. We surveyed sex ratios of both species in an upstate New York population and obtained RNA-seq data from wild-caught individuals of both species to examine within- and between-species patterns of molecular evolution in protein-coding genes. The sex ratio and RNA-seq data together provide strong evidence that this population is entirely asexual and triploid, while the population is sexual and diploid. Although all the wild individuals used for sequencing shared identical genotypes at nearly all SNPs, supporting a clonal origin, heterozygosity and SNP density were much higher in than in the sexually reproducing . This observation suggests this parthenogenic lineage may have arisen via mating between two divergent diploid lineages. Between-species sequence comparisons showed no evidence of ineffective purifying selection in the asexual lineage, as measured by the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS ratios). Likewise, there was no difference between and in the ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous SNPs overall (pN/pS). However, pN/pS ratios in were significantly higher when considering only SNPs that may have arisen via recent mutation after the transition to parthenogenesis. Thus, these recent SNPs are consistent with the hypothesis that purifying selection is less effective against new mutations in asexual lineages, but only over long time scales. This system provides a useful model for future studies on the evolutionary tradeoffs between sexual and asexual reproduction in nature.