• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心脏骤停和心源性休克的回顾性多中心研究。

Cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China: A retrospective multicenter study.

作者信息

Liu Shao-Shuai, Wang Juan, Tan Hui-Qiong, Yang Yan-Min, Zhu Jun

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 758 Hefei Road, Qingdao, Shandong, 266035, China.

Emergency Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100037, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 6;10(13):e34070. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34070. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34070
PMID:39071654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11279725/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on the effect of cardiac arrest (CA), cardiogenic shock (CS), and their combination on the prognosis of Chinese patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. The present study sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of STEMI complicated by CA and CS, and to identify the risk factors for CA or CS.

METHODS

This study included 7468 consecutive patients with STEMI in China. The patients were divided into 4 groups (CA + CS, CA only, CS only, and No CA or CS). The endpoints were 30-day all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

CA, CS, and their combination were noted in 332 (4.4 %), 377 (5.0 %), and 117 (1.6 %) among all patients. During the 30-day follow-up, 817 (10.9 %) all-cause deaths and 964 (12.9 %) major adverse cardiovascular events occurred, and the incidence of all-cause mortality (3.6 %, 62.3 %, 74.1 %, 83.3 %) and major adverse cardiovascular events (5.4 %, 67.1 %, 75.0 %, and 87.2 %) significantly increased in the No CA or CS, CS only, CA only, and CA + CS groups, respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression models, compared with the No CA or CS group, the CA + CS, CA, and S-only groups were associated with an increased risk of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events. Patients with CA + CS had the highest risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 25.259 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 19.221-33.195]) and major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 19.098, 95%CI 14.797-24.648).

CONCLUSIONS

CA, CS, and their combination were observed in approximately 11 % of Chinese patients with STEMI, and were associated with increased risk for 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events in Chinese patients with STEMI.

摘要

背景

关于心脏骤停(CA)、心源性休克(CS)及其联合情况对中国ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者预后影响的数据有限。本研究旨在评估STEMI合并CA和CS的临床结局,并确定发生CA或CS的危险因素。

方法

本研究纳入了中国7468例连续的STEMI患者。患者被分为4组(CA + CS、仅CA、仅CS以及无CA或CS)。终点为30天全因死亡和主要不良心血管事件。进行了Cox比例风险回归分析。

结果

在所有患者中,CA、CS及其联合情况分别见于332例(4.4%)、377例(5.0%)和117例(1.6%)。在30天随访期间,发生了817例(10.9%)全因死亡和964例(12.9%)主要不良心血管事件,全因死亡率(3.6%、62.3%、74.1%、83.3%)和主要不良心血管事件发生率(5.4%、67.1%、75.0%、87.2%)在无CA或CS、仅CS、仅CA以及CA + CS组中分别显著增加。在多变量Cox回归模型中,与无CA或CS组相比,CA + CS、CA和仅CS组全因死亡和主要不良心血管事件风险增加。CA + CS患者全因死亡风险最高(风险比[HR],25.259[95%置信区间(CI)19.221 - 33.195])和主要不良心血管事件风险最高(HR 19.098,95%CI 14.797 - 24.648)。

结论

在中国STEMI患者中,约11%观察到CA、CS及其联合情况,并且与中国STEMI患者30天死亡率和主要不良心血管事件风险增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6714/11279725/8eabcfdffa57/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6714/11279725/8eabcfdffa57/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6714/11279725/8eabcfdffa57/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China: A retrospective multicenter study.中国ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心脏骤停和心源性休克的回顾性多中心研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 6;10(13):e34070. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34070. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
Long-term outcomes of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction according to timing of occurrence.根据发生时间,ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心源性休克和心脏骤停的长期预后。
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Sep 3;4(5):oeae075. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae075. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States, 2000-2017.2000 - 2017年美国心源性休克和心脏骤停并发ST段抬高型心肌梗死的情况
Resuscitation. 2020 Oct;155:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
4
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of STEMI Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克和心脏骤停患者的临床特征和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 25;13(10):1211-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.004.
5
Epidemiology of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest complicating non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 18-year US study.心源性休克和心脏骤停并发非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的流行病学:美国18年研究
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;8(3):2259-2269. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13321. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Middle Eastern Country: A Single-Center Experience.中东某国急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的心源性休克:单中心经验
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2023 Jan 20;34(4):232-240. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1323. eCollection 2022.
7
Renal impairment and mortality in patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock/cardiac arrest.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克/心搏骤停患者的肾功能损害与死亡率。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Aug;102(2):179-190. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30753. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
8
Comparison of the prognosis for different onset stage of cardiogenic shock secondary to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.比较不同发病阶段的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死所致心原性休克的预后。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01583-1.
9
Treatment Intensity for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock: Comparison Between STEMI and Non-STEMI.用于心源性休克管理的治疗强度:ST段抬高型心肌梗死与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的比较
JACC Adv. 2023 May 26;2(3):100314. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100314. eCollection 2023 May.
10
Risk factors of late cardiogenic shock and mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者心源牲休克和死亡的危险因素。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Feb;7(1):7-15. doi: 10.1177/2048872617706503. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary Management of Concomitant Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction.当代心肌梗死合并心原性休克并发心搏骤停的处理。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Dec;97(12):2333-2354. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.06.027.
2
Impact of glycemic gap on 30-day adverse outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.血糖波动对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 30 天不良结局的影响。
Atherosclerosis. 2022 Nov;360:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
3
Clinical characteristics and evolution of patients with cardiogenic shock in Argentina in the context of an acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation. Data from the nationwide ARGEN-IAM-ST Registry.
阿根廷ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者心源性休克的临床特征及演变。来自全国性ARGEN-IAM-ST注册研究的数据。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Feb;48(2):101468. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101468. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Early ACEI/ARB use and in-hospital outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients with systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from the CCC-ACS project.收缩压<100 mmHg且接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者早期使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂及其院内结局:CCC-ACS项目的研究结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 29;9:1003442. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1003442. eCollection 2022.
5
Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization Among Young Adults With and Without Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.心梗后伴有和不伴有心原性休克的青年患者的死亡率和心力衰竭住院率。
J Card Fail. 2023 Jan;29(1):18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
6
2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death.2022年欧洲心脏病学会室性心律失常患者管理和心脏性猝死预防指南
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):3997-4126. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262.
7
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月获得美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 8;79(9):933-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Esmolol to Treat the Hemodynamic Effects of Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial.艾司洛尔治疗脓毒性休克的血流动力学效应:一项随机对照试验。
Shock. 2022 Apr 1;57(4):508-517. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001905.
9
Prognostic implications and outcomes of cardiac arrest among contemporary patients with STEMI treated with PCI.当代接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者心脏骤停的预后影响及结局
Resusc Plus. 2021 Jul 15;7:100149. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100149. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Use of Post-Acute Care Services and Readmissions After Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心脏骤停和心源性休克后急性后期护理服务的使用及再入院情况
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Feb 8;5(2):320-329. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.12.006. eCollection 2021 Apr.