Oates Connor P, Lawrence Luke L, Bigham Grace E, Meda Namratha S, Basyal Binaya, Rao Sriram D, Hadadi Cyrus A, Najjar Samer S, Shah Manish H, Sheikh Farooq H, Lam Phillip H
From the MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
ASAIO J. 2025 Feb 1;71(2):157-163. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002279. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients receiving durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unclear and there is no consensus regarding postoperative management. We sought to determine the impact of postoperative management of CRT on clinical outcomes following LVAD implantation. A total of 789 patients underwent LVAD implantation at our institution from 2007 to 2022 including 195 patients (24.7%) with preoperative CRT. Patients with preoperative CRT were significantly older and more frequently received an LVAD as destination therapy compared to patients without preoperative CRT. After LVAD implantation, 85 patients had CRT programmed "off" and 74 patients had CRT programmed "on." The risk of mortality was significantly increased amongst patients with preoperative CRT that was turned "on" following LVAD implantation compared to patients with preoperative CRT turned "off" following implant (subdistribution hazard ratio [sdHR] = 1.54; 1.06-2.37 95% confidence interval [CI]; p = 0.036). There was no significant difference between incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without postoperative CRT "on" (35.1% vs . 48.2%; p = 0.095). Additional clinical trials are warranted to determine the best CRT programming strategy following LVAD implantation.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对接受持久性左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入的患者的影响仍不明确,并且术后管理方面尚无共识。我们试图确定CRT术后管理对LVAD植入后临床结局的影响。2007年至2022年期间,共有789例患者在我们机构接受了LVAD植入,其中195例患者(24.7%)术前接受了CRT。与未接受术前CRT的患者相比,术前接受CRT的患者年龄更大,且更频繁地接受LVAD作为目标治疗。LVAD植入后,85例患者的CRT程控为“关闭”,74例患者的CRT程控为“开启”。与LVAD植入后CRT程控为“关闭”的术前CRT患者相比,LVAD植入后CRT程控为“开启”的术前CRT患者的死亡风险显著增加(亚组分布风险比[sdHR]=1.54;95%置信区间[CI]为1.06 - 2.37;p = 0.036)。术后CRT“开启”和“关闭”的患者室性心律失常发生率无显著差异(35.1%对48.2%;p = 0.095)。有必要进行更多临床试验以确定LVAD植入后最佳的CRT程控策略。