Suppr超能文献

2016 年至 2022 年医疗保险、医疗补助和私人保险中英夫利昔单抗生物类似药的使用模式。

Patterns of Infliximab Biosimilar Uptake for Medicare, Medicaid, and Private Insurance from 2016 to 2022.

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco.

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;76(12):1739-1742. doi: 10.1002/art.42963. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Biosimilars have the potential to reduce spending on biologic drugs, yet uptake has been slower than anticipated. We investigated how successive introductions of infliximab biosimilars influenced their adoption by major US insurance providers.

METHODS

Data came from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness, a national registry with electronic health records from more than 1,100 US rheumatologists. All infliximab administrations (bio-originator or biosimilar) to patients aged ≥18 years from April 2016 to September 2022 were included. We used an interrupted time series to model the effect of each infliximab biosimilar release (infliximab-dyyb, November 2016; infliximab-adba, July 2017; and infliximab-axxq, July 2020) on uptake across Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers.

RESULTS

With the first and second biosimilar releases, biosimilar uptake rose slowly, with average annual increases of ≤5% from 2016 to June 2020 (Medicare 3.2%, Medicaid 5.2%, and private insurance 1.8%). With the third biosimilar release in July 2020, the average annual increase reached 13% for Medicaid and 16.4% for private insurance but remained low for Medicare (5.6%). By September 2022, uptake was higher for Medicaid (43.8%) and private insurance (38.5%) than for Medicare (24%).

CONCLUSION

Our results have two key findings for policy makers. First, our results suggest that one or two biosimilars may not generate enough competition to speed adoption rates for biosimilars. Second, Medicare, which covers most patients receiving biologics nationally, had slow adoption rates even after the third biosimilar was introduced. Policy levers to speed adoption among Medicare beneficiaries are needed.

摘要

目的

生物仿制药具有降低生物药物支出的潜力,但采用速度却低于预期。我们研究了英夫利昔单抗生物类似药的连续推出如何影响主要美国保险公司对其的采用。

方法

数据来自 Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness,这是一个拥有来自 1100 多名美国风湿病学家的电子健康记录的全国性注册中心。纳入了 2016 年 4 月至 2022 年 9 月间≥18 岁患者的所有英夫利昔单抗(生物原研药或生物类似药)治疗。我们使用中断时间序列模型来模拟每个英夫利昔单抗生物类似药发布(英夫利昔单抗-dyyb,2016 年 11 月;英夫利昔单抗-adba,2017 年 7 月;英夫利昔单抗-axxq,2020 年 7 月)对医疗保险、医疗补助和私人保险机构采用率的影响。

结果

随着前两个生物类似药的推出,生物类似药的采用率增长缓慢,2016 年至 2020 年 6 月的年平均增长率≤5%(医疗保险 3.2%、医疗补助 5.2%和私人保险 1.8%)。2020 年 7 月第三个生物类似药发布后,医疗补助的年平均增长率达到 13%,私人保险为 16.4%,而医疗保险仍较低(5.6%)。截至 2022 年 9 月,医疗补助(43.8%)和私人保险(38.5%)的采用率高于医疗保险(24%)。

结论

我们的研究结果为决策者提供了两个关键发现。首先,我们的结果表明,一两个生物类似药可能无法产生足够的竞争,以加快生物类似药的采用率。其次,医疗保险覆盖了全国大多数接受生物制剂治疗的患者,即使在第三个生物类似药推出后,其采用率也很低。需要采取政策措施来加快医疗保险受益人的采用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验