• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TikTok 和儿科肾脏病学:与儿童肾脏病和肾移植相关视频的内容质量评估。

TikTok and pediatric nephrology: content quality assessment of videos related to pediatric kidney disease and kidney transplant.

机构信息

Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Uniondale, NY, USA.

Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Cohen Children's Medical Center, 269-01 76th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY, 11040, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 2024 Dec;39(12):3505-3511. doi: 10.1007/s00467-024-06462-x. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00467-024-06462-x
PMID:39078507
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social media platforms such as TikTok™ are key sources of health information for young patients and caregivers. Misinformation is prevalent on TikTok™ across healthcare fields, which can perpetuate false beliefs about medical care. Limited data exists on the reliability of pediatric nephrology TikTok™ content. This study aimed to describe the quality of medical content of TikTok™ Videos (TTVs), related to pediatric kidney disease and transplant.

METHODS

TTVs were selected using specific search terms and categorized into pediatric kidney disease and kidney transplant, excluding duplicate and adult-related content. The top 100 TTVs in each category, based on views, were analyzed. TTV characteristics were stratified by account type (physician, non-physician healthcare professional (HCP), non-HCP) and video aim (personal story, education, entertainment). DISCERN scoring, a validated questionnaire evaluating health information reliability, was conducted by 4 independent raters. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using a 2-way random effects model, and differences between content creator types were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and post-Hoc Tukey test.

RESULTS

TTVs had a total of 12.5 million likes and 113.1 million views. Over 70% of videos were created by non-HCPs (n = 147/200). DISCERN scoring revealed low reliability of medical information across content creator types. TTVs created by physicians and non-physician HCPs about kidney disease had significantly higher mean DISCERN scores compared to those created by non-HCPs (2.85, p < 0.001 and 2.48, p = 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Educators within the pediatric nephrology community must keep in mind the lack of reliability of medical information available on TikTok™ and coordinate collective efforts to consider utilizing TikTok™ for patient education.

摘要

背景

TikTok™等社交媒体平台是年轻患者和护理人员获取健康信息的主要来源。在整个医疗保健领域,TikTok™上普遍存在错误信息,这可能会导致人们对医疗保健产生错误的信念。关于儿科肾脏病学 TikTok™内容的可靠性,数据有限。本研究旨在描述与儿科肾脏疾病和移植相关的 TikTok™视频(TTV)的医疗内容质量。

方法

使用特定的搜索词选择 TTV,并将其分为儿科肾脏病和肾脏移植两类,排除重复和成人相关内容。根据浏览量,对每个类别中的前 100 个 TTV 进行分析。根据账户类型(医生、非医生医疗保健专业人员(HCP)、非 HCP)和视频目的(个人故事、教育、娱乐)对 TTV 特征进行分层。由 4 名独立评估者进行 DISCERN 评分,这是一种评估健康信息可靠性的有效问卷。使用双向随机效应模型评估组内一致性,使用单向方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验评估内容创建者类型之间的差异。

结果

TTV 总共有 1250 万点赞和 1.131 亿次浏览。超过 70%的视频是由非 HCP 制作的(n=147/200)。DISCERN 评分显示,不同内容创建者类型的医疗信息可靠性均较低。关于肾脏病的 TTV 由医生和非医生 HCP 制作的平均 DISCERN 评分明显高于非 HCP 制作的 TTV(分别为 2.85,p<0.001 和 2.48,p=0.005)。

结论

儿科肾脏病学教育者必须牢记 TikTok™上提供的医疗信息缺乏可靠性,并协调集体努力,考虑将 TikTok™用于患者教育。

相似文献

1
TikTok and pediatric nephrology: content quality assessment of videos related to pediatric kidney disease and kidney transplant.TikTok 和儿科肾脏病学:与儿童肾脏病和肾移植相关视频的内容质量评估。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2024 Dec;39(12):3505-3511. doi: 10.1007/s00467-024-06462-x. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
TikTok: An Opportunity for Antibiotic Education?抖音:抗生素教育的契机?
Innov Pharm. 2022 Dec 26;13(4). doi: 10.24926/iip.v13i4.4916. eCollection 2022.
3
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.TikTok 胆囊疾病相关视频信息质量:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.
4
An Analysis of Cosmetic Facial Injectable Treatment Content on TikTok.浅析 TikTok 上的美容面部注射治疗内容
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Aug 17;43(9):1048-1056. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad095.
5
A cross-sectional content quality analysis of information in TikTok videos on "Dermarolling (Roller Microneedling)".对 TikTok 视频中关于“微针滚轮(Roller Microneedling)”的信息进行横断面内容质量分析。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Sep;23(9):2996-2999. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16399. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
6
TransTok - An analysis of surgical gender affirmation content on TikTok.TransTok - 对 TikTok 上的外科性别肯定内容的分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Sep;84:214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.038. Epub 2023 May 19.
7
Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.《TikTok 上与 Takotsubo 综合征相关视频的质量和观众参与度:内容分析》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e39360. doi: 10.2196/39360.
8
Investigating Topical Steroid Withdrawal Videos on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Top 100 Videos.调查 TikTok 上的局部用皮质类固醇戒断视频:前 100 个视频的横断面分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 29;8:e48389. doi: 10.2196/48389.
9
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
10
An Analysis of Male Plastic Surgery Content on TikTok.男性在 TikTok 上的整容手术内容分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Apr 4;44(5):556-564. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad350.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Educational Quality and Accuracy of Carpal Tunnel-and Cubital Tunnel-Related Videos on TikTok.评估TikTok上与腕管和肘管相关视频的教育质量和准确性。
Hand (N Y). 2025 Sep 7:15589447251366458. doi: 10.1177/15589447251366458.
2
Is This the Right Link? How TikTok Views Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.这是正确的链接吗?TikTok 对肿瘤整形乳房手术的看法。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17858-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Misinformation about Monkeypox on TikTok.TikTok 上有关猴痘的错误信息。
Skinmed. 2023 Sep 29;21(4):248-251. eCollection 2023.
2
A cross-sectional quality assessment of TikTok content on benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生症 TikTok 内容的横断面质量评估。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3051-3057. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04601-x. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Safety outcomes of the first Rigi10™ malleable penile prostheses implanted worldwide.全球首例植入Rigi10™可弯曲阴茎假体的安全性结果。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Dec;36(8):833-837. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00761-x. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
TikTok and YouTube Videos on Overactive Bladder Exhibit Poor Quality and Diversity.TikTok 和 YouTube 上关于膀胱过度活动症的视频质量和多样性较差。
Urol Pract. 2023 Sep;10(5):493-500. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000423. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
5
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.TikTok 胆囊疾病相关视频信息质量:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.
6
The Assessment of TikTok as a Source of Quality Health Information on Varicoceles.精索静脉曲张相关优质健康信息来源评估——TikTok 研究
Urology. 2023 May;175:170-174. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.016. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
7
#Neurosurgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Neurosurgical Content on TikTok.神经外科:TikTok上神经外科内容的横断面分析
World Neurosurg X. 2022 Sep 9;17:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100137. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.《TikTok 上与 Takotsubo 综合征相关视频的质量和观众参与度:内容分析》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e39360. doi: 10.2196/39360.
9
The unintentional spread of misinformation on 'TikTok'; A paediatric urological perspective.“TikTok”上无意传播的错误信息;小儿泌尿科视角。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Jun;18(3):371-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
10
Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok.YouTube 和 TikTok 上治疗勃起功能障碍视频的横断面和对比分析。
Andrologia. 2022 Jun;54(5):e14392. doi: 10.1111/and.14392. Epub 2022 Feb 4.