Suppr超能文献

荷包缝合法联合负压伤口治疗用于造口关闭的研究

Study of Purse-string Skin Closure Plus Negative-pressure Wound Therapy for Stoma Closure.

作者信息

Okazawa Y U, Kojima Yutaka, Takehara Kazuhiro, Nojiri Shouko, Amemiya Kota, Tsuchiya Yuki, Honjo Kumpei, Takahashi Rina, Kawai Masaya, Sugimoto Kiichi, Takahashi Makoto, Sakamoto Kazuhiro

出版信息

Juntendo Iji Zasshi. 2022 Dec 1;68(6):599-605. doi: 10.14789/jmj.JMJ22-0015-OA. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although purse-string skin closure (PSC) is an effective method for stoma closure considering wound infection, the period for scarring will be prolonged. The aim of this study was to assess whether negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can reduce the wound-scarring period for PSC after stoma closure.

METHODS

Patients who underwent stoma closure between January 2015 and August 2020 at our department were retrospectively assessed. Patients in the control group received only PSC, and patients in the NPWT group received both PSC and NPWT using the VAC or PICO. The primary endpoint of this study was the short-term reduction ratio (RR). The RR is calculated by the length, width, and depth of the wound of the stoma closure site. The secondary endpoints were scarring period and wound-related complications such as surgical site infection, dermatitis, bleeding, enterocutaneous fistula, and ventral hernia.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients included in this study, 21 had their stoma closed by PSC and 32 had their stoma closed by PSC plus NPWT. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics or peri-operative states. The RR in the NPWT group was significantly smaller than that in the PSC group at 7 postoperative days (p=0.04). There was no difference in scarring period between the two groups (p=0.11).The rates of postoperative wound-related complications were similar in the two groups (control group: 4 (19%), NPWT group: 7 (21.9%), p=1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that PSC plus NPWT might be more effective for wound healing after stoma closure than only PSC.

摘要

背景

尽管荷包缝合法(PSC)是一种考虑到伤口感染的有效造口关闭方法,但瘢痕形成期会延长。本研究的目的是评估负压伤口治疗(NPWT)是否可以缩短造口关闭后PSC的伤口瘢痕形成期。

方法

回顾性评估2015年1月至2020年8月在我科接受造口关闭的患者。对照组患者仅接受PSC,NPWT组患者接受PSC并使用VAC或PICO进行NPWT。本研究的主要终点是短期缩小率(RR)。RR通过造口关闭部位伤口的长度、宽度和深度计算得出。次要终点是瘢痕形成期和伤口相关并发症,如手术部位感染、皮炎、出血、肠皮肤瘘和腹疝。

结果

本研究纳入的53例患者中,21例通过PSC关闭造口,32例通过PSC加NPWT关闭造口。患者特征或围手术期状态未观察到显著差异。术后7天,NPWT组的RR显著小于PSC组(p=0.04)。两组的瘢痕形成期无差异(p=0.11)。两组术后伤口相关并发症发生率相似(对照组:4例(19%),NPWT组:7例(21.9%),p=1.0)。

结论

我们的研究表明,造口关闭后,PSC加NPWT可能比单纯PSC在伤口愈合方面更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beba/11284288/57a220ba2783/2188-2126-68-6-0599-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验