Bragard Claude, Baptista Paula, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Di Serio Francesco, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Stefani Emilio, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Vicent Civera Antonio, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Battisti Andrea, Christoph Eugen, Mas Hugo, Rigling Daniel, Faccoli Massimo, Mikulová Alžběta, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Stergulc Fabio, Streissl Franz, Gonthier Paolo
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 30;22(7):e8892. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8892. eCollection 2024 Jul.
The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to deliver a risk assessment on the likelihood of pest freedom from Union quarantine pests and pests subject to measures adopted pursuant to Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 2016/2031 for the maple veneer sheets manufactured according to the process set out by Canada, with emphasis on the freedom from and (non-EU isolates). The assessment was conducted for veneer sheets of up to 0.7 mm and up to 6 mm thickness, taking into account the different phases in the veneer production in a systems approach. Some of those phases, taken alone, including the heat treatment of logs in a water bath, the cutting into thin veneer sheets and the final high heat drying of veneer sheets are expected to be effective against some of the pests, without uncertainties, making the system approach fully effective. The panel considers that no insects would survive cutting of logs into thin veneer sheets of 0.7 mm and that will not survive the temperatures in the water bath and final drying of veneers. The degree of pest freedom for the different groups of organisms is generally very high with slightly lower degree of pest freedom for veneer sheets of 6 mm thickness because of lower temperatures reached in the final drying of veneer sheets compared to thinner sheets. is not expected to survive the high heat drying of thin veneer sheets, but it may survive the lower temperatures inside thicker veneer sheets. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) indicated, with 95% certainty, that between 9989 and 10,000 veneer sheets (thickness 6 mm) per 10,000 will be free from living For the EKE indicated, with 95% certainty, that between 9984 and 10,000 veneer sheets (0.7 mm) per 10,000 and that between 9954 and 10,000 veneer sheets (6 mm) per 10,000 will be free from living inoculum For other relevant groups of pests, the greatest likelihood of pest presence was observed for wood decay fungi. The EKE indicated, with 95% certainty, that between 9967 and 10,000 veneer sheets (0.7 mm) per 10,000 and that between 9911 and 10,000 veneer sheets (6 mm) per 10,000 will be free from living wood decay fungi.
欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组对按照加拿大规定的工艺生产的枫木胶合板免于欧盟检疫性有害生物以及免于根据欧盟第2016/2031号条例第30条采取措施的有害生物的可能性进行风险评估,重点是免于[具体有害生物1]和[具体有害生物2](非欧盟分离株)。评估针对厚度达0.7毫米和达6毫米的胶合板进行,采用系统方法考虑胶合板生产的不同阶段。其中一些单独的阶段,包括原木在水浴中的热处理、切割成薄胶合板以及胶合板的最终高温干燥,预计对某些有害生物有效且无不确定性,从而使系统方法完全有效。该小组认为,将原木切割成0.7毫米的薄胶合板时没有昆虫能够存活,并且[具体有害生物1]在水浴温度和胶合板最终干燥过程中无法存活。不同生物群体的有害生物免于率通常非常高,6毫米厚的胶合板的有害生物免于率略低,因为与较薄的胶合板相比,6毫米厚胶合板在最终干燥时达到的温度较低。预计[具体有害生物2]在薄胶合板的高温干燥过程中无法存活,但它可能在较厚胶合板内部的较低温度下存活。专家知识 elicitation(EKE)表明,在95%的置信度下,每10,000张6毫米厚的胶合板中有9989至10,000张将没有活的[具体有害生物1]。对于[具体有害生物2],EKE表明在95%的置信度下,每10,000张0.7毫米厚的胶合板中有9984至10,000张以及每10,000张6毫米厚的胶合板中有9954至10,000张将没有活的接种体。对于其他相关有害生物群体,观察到木材腐朽真菌存在有害生物的可能性最大。EKE表明,在95%的置信度下,每10,000张0.7毫米厚的胶合板中有9967至10,000张以及每10,000张6毫米厚的胶合板中有9911至10,000张将没有活的木材腐朽真菌。