• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险对临终关怀的偿付:成本控制策略的伦理与政策影响

Medicare reimbursement for hospice care: ethical and policy implications of cost-containment strategies.

作者信息

Fraser I

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1985 Fall;10(3):565-78. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-3-565.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-10-3-565
PMID:3908551
Abstract

In several areas of health policy, current concern over rising costs has generated considerably political support for reforms that many in the business have advocated unsuccessfully on philosophical, ethical, or humanitarian grounds for years. Thus, for example, the spiraling cost of caring for the mentally ill and the developmentally disabled in an institutional setting has breathed new life into proposals to bring these groups out into the community where they can live more independently--and more cheaply. But this overlap of quality and frugality goals is only partial. Although alliances with cost-cutters can bring reform, health policy reformers are discovering that they may have to accept a lot of bathwater along with the baby. Medicare reimbursement for hospice care, authorized by Section 122 of PL 97-248, the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, provides one recent example of this dilemma. This article discusses the results of a survey--conducted by the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services--to discover how many hospices would seek certification for reimbursement by Medicare, how many patients would be served, and the consequences of this legislation for cost, access, and quality of service.

摘要

在卫生政策的几个领域,当前对成本上升的担忧为改革赢得了相当多的政治支持,而多年来商界许多人出于哲学、伦理或人道主义理由倡导这些改革却未成功。例如,在机构环境中照顾精神病患者和发育障碍者的成本不断攀升,使得将这些群体带出机构、融入社区的提议有了新的活力,因为在社区他们可以更独立地生活——而且成本更低。但质量目标和节俭目标的这种重叠只是部分的。尽管与削减成本者结成联盟能够推动改革,但卫生政策改革者发现,他们可能不得不连婴儿带洗澡水一起倒掉。1982年《税收公平与财政责任法》(公法97 - 248)第122节授权的医疗保险临终关怀报销政策,就是这一困境的一个最新例子。本文讨论了美国卫生与公众服务部监察长办公室开展的一项调查结果,该调查旨在了解有多少临终关怀机构会寻求医疗保险报销认证、将服务多少患者,以及这项立法对成本、可及性和服务质量的影响。

相似文献

1
Medicare reimbursement for hospice care: ethical and policy implications of cost-containment strategies.医疗保险对临终关怀的偿付:成本控制策略的伦理与政策影响
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1985 Fall;10(3):565-78. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-3-565.
2
Medicare reimbursement for hospice care: an approach for analyzing cost consequences.医疗保险对临终关怀的报销:一种分析成本后果的方法。
Inquiry. 1986 Summer;23(2):141-53.
3
The Medicare hospice benefit: the effectiveness of price incentives in health care policy.医疗保险临终关怀福利:医疗保健政策中价格激励措施的有效性。
Rand J Econ. 1993 Winter;24(4):605-24.
4
Hospice care in America.美国的临终关怀服务。
JAMA. 1990 Jul 18;264(3):369-72.
5
Medicare coverage of hospice care.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984 May;41(5):942-4.
6
Implications of the new hospice legislation and the accompanying regulations.新临终关怀立法及相关法规的影响。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1985 Jun;20(2):281-98.
7
National hospice study analysis plan.国家临终关怀研究分析计划。
J Chronic Dis. 1983;36(11):737-80. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(83)90069-3.
8
Medicare hospice benefit: early program experiences.医疗保险临终关怀福利:早期项目经验
Health Care Financ Rev. 1988 Summer;9(4):99-111.
9
Ethical dilemmas in hospice and palliative care.临终关怀与姑息治疗中的伦理困境。
Support Care Cancer. 1995 Jan;3(1):28-36. doi: 10.1007/BF00343918.
10
Medicare program; hospice care--HCFA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist. 1983 Aug 22;48(163):38146-75.

引用本文的文献

1
Health policy in the United States: issues and options.美国的卫生政策:问题与选择。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1987 Jun;63(5):427-79.