• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间土耳其夫妻的日常外部压力、内部压力、对偶应对策略和关系功能:一项每日日记研究。

Daily external stress, internal stress, dyadic coping, and relationship functioning of Turkish couples during the COVID-19: A daily diary study.

机构信息

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Department of Psychology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Stress Health. 2024 Oct;40(5):e3455. doi: 10.1002/smi.3455. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1002/smi.3455
PMID:39088421
Abstract

Stressors arising from the current COVID-19 pandemic have pernicious effects on relational functioning. However, the systemic transactional model (STM) addresses the buffering role of dyadic coping in couples' relationships. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine the possible buffering role of dyadic coping and investigate the negative consequences of external stressors related to the COVID-19 pandemic and internal stressors on relationship satisfaction and intimacy on within- and between-person levels. Data were collected from 100 couples through daily diary questions over 14 consecutive days. The mean age for females was 32.45 years (SD = 8.11), and for males, it was 34.79 years (SD = 8.79). The findings showed several significant within-person moderation effects. Specifically, simple slope analysis revealed that the associations between internal stress and relationship satisfaction, and intimacy were positive for both partners who reported particularly more dyadic coping on a given day. Conversely, interaction effect of dyadic coping with external stress has not been found significant on within-person level. Between-person effects revealed that dyadic coping buffers the negative association between external stress and relational outcomes and the negative effect of internal stress. The current study expanded the literature of the STM of dyadic coping within the context of an acute external crisis. In line with STM predictions, couples may benefit from interventions focused on enhancing coping strategies to navigate major and minor stressors, especially during significant life challenges, thereby maintaining high relationship quality.

摘要

当前 COVID-19 大流行带来的压力源对关系功能有不良影响。然而,系统交易模型(STM)解决了对偶应对在夫妻关系中的缓冲作用。因此,本研究旨在检验对偶应对的可能缓冲作用,并研究与 COVID-19 大流行相关的外部压力源和内部压力源对关系满意度和亲密感的负面影响,在个体内和个体间水平上。数据是通过连续 14 天的每日日记问题从 100 对夫妇中收集的。女性的平均年龄为 32.45 岁(SD=8.11),男性为 34.79 岁(SD=8.79)。研究结果显示了几个显著的个体内调节效应。具体来说,简单斜率分析表明,对于那些在特定一天报告了更多对偶应对的伴侣来说,内部压力与关系满意度和亲密感之间的关联是正相关的。相反,在个体内水平上,对偶应对与外部压力的交互作用不显著。个体间效应表明,对偶应对缓冲了外部压力与关系结果之间的负相关关系,以及内部压力的负面影响。本研究扩展了对偶应对的 STM 在急性外部危机背景下的文献。与 STM 的预测一致,夫妻可能会受益于侧重于增强应对策略的干预措施,以应对重大和次要压力源,特别是在重大生活挑战期间,从而维持较高的关系质量。

相似文献

1
Daily external stress, internal stress, dyadic coping, and relationship functioning of Turkish couples during the COVID-19: A daily diary study.新冠疫情期间土耳其夫妻的日常外部压力、内部压力、对偶应对策略和关系功能:一项每日日记研究。
Stress Health. 2024 Oct;40(5):e3455. doi: 10.1002/smi.3455. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
Daily dyadic coping during COVID-19 among Israeli couples.COVID-19 期间以色列夫妇的日常双重应对。
Emotion. 2022 Dec;22(8):1713-1722. doi: 10.1037/emo0000971. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Sexual growth and destiny beliefs: Longitudinal associations with dyadic coping among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction.性成长和命运信念:与寻求医学辅助生殖的夫妇的对偶应对的纵向关联。
J Sex Med. 2023 Oct 3;20(10):1241-1251. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad098.
4
Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: a systematic review.应对癌症的夫妻中的二元应对与关系功能:一项系统综述
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(1):85-114. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12094. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
5
Romantic partners' individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: implications for relationship functioning.浪漫伴侣的个体应对策略和双重应对策略:对关系功能的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):551-9. doi: 10.1037/a0020836.
6
Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples' relationships.运用关系科学评估 COVID-19 大流行可能如何影响夫妻关系。
Am Psychol. 2021 Apr;76(3):438-450. doi: 10.1037/amp0000714. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
7
Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis.二元应对与关系满意度:元分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:28-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
8
To say or not to say: Dyadic ambivalence over emotional expression and its associations with pain, sexuality, and distress in couples coping with provoked vestibulodynia.说还是不说:应对激发性前庭痛的夫妻在情感表达上的二元矛盾及其与疼痛、性和痛苦的关联
J Sex Med. 2014 May;11(5):1271-82. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12463. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
9
Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study.乳腺癌患者夫妻间的二元应对:一项基于人群的纵向研究。
Health Psychol. 2015 May;34(5):486-95. doi: 10.1037/hea0000218. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
10
Couples coping with stress: Between-person differences and within-person processes.夫妻应对压力:个体间差异与个体内过程。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Apr;32(3):366-374. doi: 10.1037/fam0000380. Epub 2018 Mar 8.