Suppr超能文献

微创疼痛程序在 CLBP 中的不同退行性疼痛发生器中有效:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Minimal-invasive pain procedures are effective in different degenerative pain generators in CLBP: A prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department for Spine Therapy, Sportclinic Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4727-4741. doi: 10.3233/THC-241003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that a significant number of spinal surgeries are performed, but many patients do not often benefit.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine how effective minimally invasive pain procedures (MIP) are in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients with proven degenerative causes (specific low back pain).

METHODS

386 eligible patients with CLBP/sciatica resistant to conservative therapy and scheduled for open surgery were screened, and 167 could be enrolled in this study. Indications for MIP in the remaining 150 individuals were made by one experienced spinal surgeon. Before and 6 months after the intervention, the numeric rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded. MIP was performed, such as radiofrequency of the facet and SI-joint, intradiscal electrothermal therapy in case of discogenic pain, as well as epidural neuroplasty in patients with disc herniation/epidural fibrosis.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant decrease in NRS (p< 0.05), as well as a significant increase in ODI (p< 0.001) 6 months after the procedures. This was also true for the results of all different pain generators and subsequent performed procedures alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The indication of MIP should be routinely reviewed in patients with CLBP to avoid potentially open surgery and a burden on healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

据估计,有大量的脊柱手术在进行,但许多患者往往并不能从中受益。

目的

我们旨在确定微创疼痛治疗(MIP)在患有明确退行性病因(特定腰痛)的慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者中的有效性。

方法

对 386 名对保守治疗有抵抗力且计划进行开放性手术的 CLBP/坐骨神经痛患者进行筛选,其中 167 名患者符合条件并被纳入本研究。其余 150 名患者的 MIP 适应证由一位经验丰富的脊柱外科医生决定。在干预前和干预后 6 个月,记录数字评分量表(NRS)和 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)。MIP 包括:关节突射频和骶髂关节射频、椎间盘源性疼痛时行椎间盘内电热疗法、椎间盘突出症/硬膜外纤维化患者行硬膜外神经松解术。

结果

术后 6 个月,NRS (p<0.05)显著降低,ODI (p<0.001)显著升高。对于所有不同的疼痛产生器和随后单独进行的治疗的结果也是如此。

结论

应常规审查 CLBP 患者的 MIP 适应证,以避免潜在的开放性手术和医疗保健费用负担。

相似文献

3
HADS and SOMS-2 brief score evaluation can prevent unnecessary minimal invasive spine interventions - a prospective blinded observational clinical trial.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Apr;144(4):1575-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05257-x. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jan;47(1):3-59. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103031. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
The role of percutaneous neurolysis in lumbar disc herniation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Korean J Pain. 2021 Jul 1;34(3):346-368. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.346.
5
The Evolution of Radiofrequency Denervation for Pain Indications.
Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(7):1465-1467. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab180.
6
A Review and Algorithm in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain.
J Pain Res. 2020 Dec 8;13:3337-3348. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S279390. eCollection 2020.
8
Radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain-comparison of two different ablation techniques.
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Feb;43(1):101-107. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1016-3. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验