Chetail Fabienne
Laboratoire Cognition Langage, & Développement (LCLD), Centre de Recherche, Cognition et Neurosciences (CRCN), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) - Av. F. Roosevelt, 50 / CP, 191-1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105905. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105905. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
Regular print exposure is thought to benefit reading and language processes: those who read more have a larger vocabulary and better spelling and comprehension skills. Yet, there is little or no direct evidence that exposure to print facilitates reading. Here, we used an ecologically valid design to test the impact of print exposure on the early stages of reading in skilled adult readers. Participants read a novel at their own pace. Reading was followed by a lexical decision task, in which the positive trials were words that were exposed in the novel, and matched controls not exposed in the novel. If exposure during reading had a positive impact on subsequent word recognition, exposed words would be processed more efficiently than not-exposed words (exposure effect). This effect was obtained in three experiments. In addition, the effect was not modulated by the amount of exposure (1 vs. 3 occurrences in the text; Experiment 1), or the timing between reading and the exposure test (immediately after reading vs. on the following day; Experiment 3). However, the effect was present only in low-frequency words (Experiment 3). Interpretations of the exposure effect in terms of activation threshold and lexical quality are discussed.
一般认为,经常接触印刷品对阅读和语言能力的发展有益:阅读量较大的人词汇量更大,拼写和理解能力也更好。然而,几乎没有直接证据表明接触印刷品有助于阅读。在此,我们采用了一种生态效度较高的设计,来测试接触印刷品对熟练成年读者阅读早期阶段的影响。参与者按照自己的节奏阅读一本小说。阅读之后进行词汇判断任务,其中肯定性试验的单词是小说中出现过的,匹配的对照词则是小说中未出现的。如果阅读过程中的接触对后续的单词识别有积极影响,那么接触过的单词将比未接触过的单词得到更高效的处理(接触效应)。在三个实验中均获得了这一效应。此外,该效应不受接触量(文本中出现1次与3次;实验1)或阅读与接触测试之间的时间间隔(阅读后立即进行测试与第二天进行测试;实验3)的调节。然而,该效应仅在低频单词中出现(实验3)。我们还讨论了从激活阈值和词汇质量方面对接触效应的解释。