Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, 4860 Y St. Suite 2300, DavisSacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 3;24(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11366-5.
A concern before 2020, physician burnout worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little empirical data are available on pandemic workplace support interventions or their influence on burnout. We surveyed a national sample of frontline physicians on burnout and workplace support during the pandemic.
We surveyed a stratified random sample of 12,833 US physicians most likely to care for adult COVID-19 patients from the comprehensive AMA Physician Professional Data ™ file. The sample included 6722 primary care physicians (3331 family physicians, 3391 internists), 880 hospitalists, 1783 critical care physicians (894 critical care physicians, 889 pulmonary intensivists), 2548 emergency medicine physicians, and 900 infectious disease physicians. The emailed survey elicited physicians' perceptions of organizational interventions to provide workplace support and/or to address burnout. Burnout was assessed with the Professional Fulfillment Index Burnout Composite scale (PFI-BC). Proportional specialty representation and response bias were addressed by survey weighting. Logistic regression assessed the association of physician characteristics and workplace interventions with burnout.
After weighting, respondents were representative of the total sample. Overall physician burnout was 45.4%, significantly higher than in our previous survey. Open-ended responses mentioned that staffing shortages (physician, nursing, and other staff) combined with the increased volume, complexity, and acuity of patients during the pandemic increased job demands. The most frequent workplace support interventions were direct pandemic control measures (increased access to personal protective equipment, 70.0%); improved telehealth functionality (43.4%); and individual resiliency tools (yoga, meditation, 30.7%). Respondents placed highest priority on workplace interventions to increase financial support and increase nursing and clinician staffing. Factors significantly associated with lower odds of burnout were practicing critical care (compared with emergency medicine) OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.12 - 0.93), improved telehealth functionality OR 0.47 (95% CI 0.23 - 0.97) and being in practice for 11 years or longer OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.19-0.99).
Burnout across frontline specialties increased during the pandemic. Physician respondents focused on inadequate staffing in the context of caring for more and sicker patients, combined with the lack of administrative efforts to mitigate problems. Burnout mitigation requires system-level interventions beyond individual-focused stress reduction programs to improve staffing, increase compensation, and build effective teams.
2020 年之前人们就已经关注到医生的职业倦怠问题,而在 COVID-19 大流行期间这一问题更加严重。目前有关大流行期间工作场所支持干预措施及其对倦怠影响的实证数据很少。我们对全国范围内的一线医生进行了一项关于大流行期间倦怠和工作场所支持的调查。
我们对来自全面 AMA 医师专业数据 ™ 文件的最有可能照顾成年 COVID-19 患者的 12833 名美国医生进行了分层随机抽样调查。该样本包括 6722 名初级保健医生(家庭医生 3331 名,内科医生 3391 名)、880 名医院医生、1783 名重症监护医生(重症监护医生 894 名,肺科重症监护医生 889 名)、2548 名急诊医生和 900 名传染病医生。通过电子邮件发送的调查询问了医生对提供工作场所支持和/或解决倦怠问题的组织干预措施的看法。职业满足指数倦怠综合量表(PFI-BC)评估了倦怠情况。通过调查加权处理了专业代表性和响应偏差的问题。逻辑回归评估了医生特征和工作场所干预措施与倦怠之间的关联。
经过加权处理后,受访者代表了总样本。整体医生倦怠率为 45.4%,明显高于我们之前的调查。开放式回答提到,疫情期间人员短缺(医生、护士和其他工作人员)加上工作量、复杂性和患者病情加重增加了工作需求。最常见的工作场所支持干预措施是直接的大流行控制措施(增加个人防护设备的获取途径,70.0%);改善远程医疗功能(43.4%);以及个人弹性工具(瑜伽、冥想,30.7%)。受访者最看重增加财政支持和增加护士及临床人员配备的工作场所干预措施。与急诊医学相比,与较低倦怠几率相关的因素包括:从事重症监护(OR 0.33,95%CI 0.12-0.93)、改善远程医疗功能(OR 0.47,95%CI 0.23-0.97)和执业 11 年或以上(OR 0.44,95%CI 0.19-0.99)。
大流行期间,一线专业医生的倦怠感增加。医生受访者关注于在照顾更多和病情更重的患者的同时人员配备不足的问题,同时缺乏减轻问题的行政努力。减轻倦怠需要系统层面的干预措施,而不仅仅是针对个人的减压计划,以改善人员配备、增加薪酬并建立有效的团队。