Barbu Elena, Mihaila Andreea, Filippi Alexandru, Stoenescu Andra, Ciortan Letitia, Butoi Elena, Beiu Cristina, Popescu Marius N, Balanescu Serban
Department of Cardiology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU.
Department of Inflammation, Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology Nicolae Simionescu, Bucharest, ROU.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 3;16(7):e63731. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63731. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Introduction Acute insulin resistance (IR) and hyperglycemia are frequently observed during acute myocardial infarction (AMI), significantly influencing both immediate and long-term patient outcomes, irrespective of diabetic status. Neutrophilia and increased neutrophil activity, which are common in these scenarios, have been associated with poorer prognoses, as demonstrated in our recent findings. While it is well established that neutrophils and stress-induced hyperglycemia exacerbate inflammation and hinder recovery, the complex interplay between these factors and their combined impact on AMI prognosis remains inadequately understood. This study aims to investigate the effects of stress hyperglycemia and IR on AMI patients at the onset of the event and to elucidate the relationship between these metabolic disturbances and inflammatory markers, particularly neutrophils. Methods We conducted a longitudinal prospective study on 219 AMI patients at Elias Emergency Hospital in Bucharest, Romania, from April 2021 to September 2022. Patients were included within 24 hours of AMI with ST-segment elevation and excluded if they had acute infections or chronic inflammatory diseases. Blood samples were collected to study inflammatory biomarkers, including neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), S100A8/A9, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-18, and IL-6. Diabetic and pre-diabetic statuses were defined using glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and medical history (ADA 2019 criteria). To assess glycemic parameters, we employed the glycemia ratio (GR) and the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index, enabling a precise evaluation of stress hyperglycemia, acute IR, and their prognostic implications. Patients were stratified into groups based on GR calculations, categorized as under-average glycemia, normal glycemia, and stress hyperglycemia. Results The majority of patients in the stress hyperglycemia group exhibited an unfavorable prognosis. This group also demonstrated significantly elevated neutrophil counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR). The GR was significantly and positively correlated with inflammation markers, including neutrophil count (Pearson's R = 0.181, P = 0.008) and NLR (Pearson's R = 0.318, P < 0.001), but showed no significant correlation with other evaluated inflammatory markers. Conclusions Our findings suggest that poor outcomes in AMI patients may be associated with stress hyperglycemia, as indicated by GR. AcuteIR, quantified by GR and HOMA-IR, exhibits a strong correlation with neutrophil count and NLR within the first 24 hours of AMI onset. However, no significant correlation was observed with other inflammatory markers, such as IL-1β, IL-18, and IL-6, underscoring the specific interplay between IR and neutrophil activity in this setting.
急性胰岛素抵抗(IR)和高血糖在急性心肌梗死(AMI)期间经常出现,无论糖尿病状态如何,都会对患者的近期和长期预后产生重大影响。中性粒细胞增多和中性粒细胞活性增加在这些情况下很常见,正如我们最近的研究结果所示,它们与较差的预后相关。虽然中性粒细胞和应激性高血糖会加剧炎症并阻碍恢复这一点已得到充分证实,但这些因素之间的复杂相互作用及其对AMI预后的综合影响仍未得到充分理解。本研究旨在调查应激性高血糖和IR在AMI事件发生时对患者的影响,并阐明这些代谢紊乱与炎症标志物,特别是中性粒细胞之间的关系。
我们于2021年4月至2022年9月在罗马尼亚布加勒斯特的埃利亚斯急诊医院对219例AMI患者进行了一项纵向前瞻性研究。患者在AMI伴ST段抬高的24小时内纳入研究,若有急性感染或慢性炎症性疾病则排除。采集血样以研究炎症生物标志物,包括中性粒细胞胞外陷阱(NETs)、S100A8/A9、白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-18和IL-6。使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和病史(ADA 2019标准)定义糖尿病和糖尿病前期状态。为评估血糖参数,我们采用血糖比值(GR)和胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)指数,以精确评估应激性高血糖、急性IR及其预后意义。根据GR计算将患者分层,分为血糖低于平均水平、血糖正常和应激性高血糖组。
应激性高血糖组的大多数患者预后不良。该组还显示中性粒细胞计数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)显著升高。GR与炎症标志物显著正相关,包括中性粒细胞计数(Pearson相关系数R = 0.181,P = 0.008)和NLR(Pearson相关系数R = 0.318,P < 0.001),但与其他评估的炎症标志物无显著相关性。
我们的研究结果表明,如GR所示,AMI患者的不良预后可能与应激性高血糖有关。由GR和HOMA-IR量化的急性IR在AMI发作的最初24小时内与中性粒细胞计数和NLR密切相关。然而,与其他炎症标志物如IL-1β、IL-18和IL-6未观察到显著相关性,这突出了在这种情况下IR与中性粒细胞活性之间的特定相互作用。