Columbia University.
The George Washington University and Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Oct;24(10):3-14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2371116. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
Recent calls to address racism in bioethics reflect a sense of urgency to mitigate the lethal effects of a lack of action. While the field was catalyzed largely in response to pivotal events deeply rooted in racism and other structures of oppression embedded in research and health care, it has failed to center racial justice in its scholarship, pedagogy, advocacy, and practice, and neglected to integrate anti-racism as a central consideration. Academic bioethics programs play a key role in determining the field's norms and practices, including methodologies, funding priorities, and professional networks that bear on equity, inclusion, and epistemic justice. This article describes recommendations from the Racial Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (REDI) Task Force commissioned by the Association of Bioethics Program Directors to prioritize and strengthen anti-racist practices in bioethics programmatic endeavors and to evaluate and develop specific goals to advance REDI.
最近呼吁在生物伦理学中解决种族主义问题，反映出一种减轻行动不足所带来致命影响的紧迫感。虽然该领域的发展主要是为了应对根植于种族主义和其他压迫结构的关键事件，这些事件嵌入在研究和医疗保健中，但它未能将种族正义作为学术研究、教学、宣传和实践的核心，也忽视了将反种族主义作为一个核心考虑因素。学术生物伦理学计划在决定该领域的规范和实践方面发挥着关键作用，包括方法学、资金优先事项以及影响公平、包容和认识论正义的专业网络。本文描述了由生物伦理学计划主任协会委托的种族平等、多样性和包容（REDI）工作组的建议，旨在优先考虑并加强生物伦理学计划工作中的反种族主义实践，并评估和制定具体目标以推进 REDI。
