Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Centre of Dental Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 32, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
Clinical Research Department, DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH, Elbgaustraße 248, 22547 Hamburg, Germany.
J Dent. 2024 Oct;149:105276. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105276. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the masking success of bleaching and/or resin infiltration treatment of fluorotic lesions in anterior teeth of adults and adolescents.
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched from the beginning of documentation to December 31, 2023.
A tooth was considered masked when the color difference (ΔE CIE76) between fluorotic areas and the surrounding sound enamel was ≤3.7 and unmasked if ΔE > 3.7. Secondary outcomes were mean ΔE values between fluorotic and sound enamel reported for a treatment group at baseline and after any intervention as well as patient satisfaction.
Of 1575 search results 4 publications met the inclusion criteria, comprising 230 treated anterior teeth with fluorosis in 47 patients. Meta-analyses were performed comparing the result after treatment (bleaching, resin infiltration, or bleaching followed by resin infiltration) to baseline.
Bleaching and resin infiltration were suitable intervention strategies to improve the esthetics of fluorosis affected anterior teeth, with a combination of both treatment approaches being particularly effective in reducing the color difference between fluorotic defects and the surrounding sound enamel below the acceptability thresholds of 3.7 (success rate [95 %CI]: 0.75 [0.44, 1.06]). Patient satisfaction increased after treatments, indicating a beneficial impact on their mental health. The overall bias of the included studies was 2.5 (ROBINS-I analysis tool).
There is evidence that resin infiltration with preceding bleaching therapy is more effective in masking fluorotic lesions in anterior teeth than bleaching alone. The combination therapy also showed a tendency towards higher success rates compared to infiltration alone. However, this difference was statistically not significant, and more studies are needed to further assess the efficacy of specific treatments and their combinations as well as the certainty in the evidence. The methodologic heterogeneity of study designs regarding estimation of color difference before and after treatment and bleaching protocols calls for unification in future studies.
Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed the combination of bleaching followed by resin infiltration as efficacious approach for masking fluorotic lesions in young adults. While resin infiltration alone improves the aesthetic appearance of fluorotic lesions, dentists should consider a combined bleaching-infiltration regimen to achieve more favorable clinical outcome for their patients.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估漂白和/或树脂渗透治疗成人和青少年前牙氟斑牙的掩蔽成功率。
从文献开始到 2023 年 12 月 31 日,系统地检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase。
当氟斑牙区域与周围正常釉质之间的色差(ΔE CIE76)≤3.7 时,牙齿被认为是被掩蔽的,如果 ΔE > 3.7,则为未被掩蔽。次要结果是基线时治疗组报告的氟斑牙和正常釉质之间的平均 ΔE 值,以及任何干预后的平均 ΔE 值,以及患者满意度。
在 1575 项搜索结果中,有 4 项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入 47 例患者的 230 颗前牙氟斑牙。对治疗后(漂白、树脂渗透或漂白后树脂渗透)与基线的结果进行了荟萃分析。
漂白和树脂渗透是改善氟斑牙前牙美观的合适干预策略,两种治疗方法的结合在降低氟斑牙缺陷与周围正常釉质之间的色差方面特别有效,低于可接受的 3.7 阈值(成功率[95%CI]:0.75 [0.44, 1.06])。治疗后患者满意度增加,表明对其心理健康有有益影响。纳入研究的总体偏倚为 2.5(ROBINS-I 分析工具)。
有证据表明,在氟斑牙前牙中,用预处理漂白联合树脂渗透治疗比单独漂白更能有效地掩盖氟斑牙。与单独渗透治疗相比,联合治疗的成功率也有更高的趋势。然而,这种差异在统计学上并不显著,需要更多的研究来进一步评估特定治疗及其组合的疗效以及证据的确定性。在评估治疗前后色差和漂白方案的研究设计的方法学异质性方面,未来的研究需要统一。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,漂白后联合树脂渗透是治疗年轻成年人氟斑牙的有效方法。虽然单独使用树脂渗透可以改善氟斑牙的美观度,但牙医应考虑联合使用漂白-渗透方案,以获得更有利于患者的临床效果。