Comparison of Relative Activity versus Relative Expression Factors (RAF versus REF) in Predicting Glucuronidation Mediated Drug Clearance Using Recombinant UGTs.

PURPOSE

Predicting the quantitative fraction of glucuronidation (f) by individual UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes (UGTs) is challenging due to the lack of selective inhibitors and inconsistent activity of recombinant UGT systems (rUGTs). Our study compares the relative expression versus activity factors (REF versus RAF) to predict f based on rUGT data to human liver and intestinal microsomes (HLM and HIM).

METHODS

REF scalars were derived from a previous in-house proteomics study for eleven UGT enzymes (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17), whereas RAF was calculated by measuring activities in rUGTs to microsomes of selective UGT probe substrates. Protein-normalized activity factor (pnAF) values were generated after correcting activity of individual UGTs to their corresponding protein abundance. The utility of REF and RAF in predicting f was assessed for three UGT substrates-diclofenac, vorinostat, and raltegravir.

RESULTS

The REF values ranged from 0.02 to 1.75, RAF based on activity obtained in rUGTs to HLM/HIM were from 0.1 to 274. pnAF values were ~ 5 to 80-fold, except for UGT2B4 and UGT2B15, where pnAF was ~ 180 and > 1000, respectively. The results revealed confounding effect of differential specific activities (per pmol) of rUGTs in f prediction.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that the activity of UGT enzymes was significantly lower when compared to their activity in microsomes at the same absolute protein amount (pmol). Collectively, results of this study demonstrate poor and variable specific activity of different rUGTs (per pmol protein), as determined by pnAF values, which should be considered in f scaling.