• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较使用 70-150μm 和 100-300μm 载药微球栓塞治疗小肝癌的疗效:一项韩国多中心研究。

Comparison of Chemoembolization Outcomes Using 70-150 µm and 100-300 µm Drug-Eluting Beads in Treating Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2024 Aug;25(8):715-725. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0231.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2024.0231
PMID:39109500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11306003/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) according to the size of the beads for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 212 patients with a single HCC ≤5 cm from five tertiary institutions. One hundred and nine patients were treated with 70-150-µm doxorubicin DEBs (group A), and 103 patients received 100-300-µm doxorubicin DEBs (group B). The initial tumor response (assessed between 3 weeks and 2 months after DEB-TACE), time to local tumor progression (TTLTP), restricted mean duration of complete response (RMDCR), rate of complications, incidence of post-embolization syndrome, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze prognostic factors for initial tumor response.

RESULTS

The initial objective response rates were 91.7% (100/109) and 84.5% (87/103) for groups A and B, respectively ( = 0.101). In the subgroup analysis of tumors ≤3 cm, the initial objective response rates were 94.6% (53/56) and 78.0% (39/50) for groups A and B, respectively ( = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the TTLTP (median, 23.7 months for group A vs. 19.0 months for group B; = 0.278 [log-rank], 0.190 [multivariable Cox regression]) or RMDCR at 24 months (11.4 months vs. 8.5 months, respectively; = 0.088). In the subgroup analysis of tumors >3-cm, the RMDCR at 24 months was significantly longer in group A than in group B (11.8 months vs. 5.7 months, = 0.024). The incidence of mild bile duct dilatation after DEB-TACE was significantly higher in group B than in group A (5.5% [6/109] vs. 18.4% [19/103], = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE using 70-150-µm microspheres demonstrated a higher initial objective response rate in ≤3-cm HCCs and a longer RMDCR at 24 months in 3.1-5-cm HCCs compared to larger DEBs (100-300-µm).

摘要

目的

评估根据微球大小进行载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)治疗小肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究纳入了来自五家三级医疗机构的 212 例单发 HCC 且肿瘤直径均≤5cm 的患者。109 例患者接受了 70-150-µm 阿霉素 DEB 治疗(A 组),103 例患者接受了 100-300-µm 阿霉素 DEB 治疗(B 组)。比较两组患者的初始肿瘤反应(DEB-TACE 后 3 周至 2 个月之间评估)、局部肿瘤进展时间(TTLTP)、完全缓解限制平均持续时间(RMDCR)、并发症发生率、栓塞后综合征发生率和住院时间。采用 logistic 回归分析初始肿瘤反应的预测因素。

结果

A 组和 B 组的初始客观缓解率分别为 91.7%(100/109)和 84.5%(87/103)( = 0.101)。在肿瘤直径≤3cm 的亚组分析中,A 组和 B 组的初始客观缓解率分别为 94.6%(53/56)和 78.0%(39/50)( = 0.012)。两组患者的 TTLTP(中位数,A 组为 23.7 个月,B 组为 19.0 个月; = 0.278[log-rank],0.190[多变量 Cox 回归])或 24 个月时的 RMDCR 无显著差异(分别为 11.4 个月和 8.5 个月; = 0.088)。在肿瘤直径>3cm 的亚组分析中,A 组的 24 个月时的 RMDCR 明显长于 B 组(11.8 个月 vs. 5.7 个月, = 0.024)。与 A 组相比,B 组患者在 DEB-TACE 后出现轻度胆管扩张的发生率明显更高(5.5%[6/109] vs. 18.4%[19/103], = 0.003)。

结论

与较大的微球(100-300-µm)相比,70-150-µm 微球的 DEB-TACE 治疗直径≤3cm 的 HCC 时初始客观缓解率更高,3.1-5cm HCC 时 24 个月时的 RMDCR 更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/a6f4718141b9/kjr-25-715-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/dd188fe181d6/kjr-25-715-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/7f3610717d13/kjr-25-715-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/50fcbee0301e/kjr-25-715-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/a6f4718141b9/kjr-25-715-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/dd188fe181d6/kjr-25-715-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/7f3610717d13/kjr-25-715-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/50fcbee0301e/kjr-25-715-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0135/11306003/a6f4718141b9/kjr-25-715-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Chemoembolization Outcomes Using 70-150 µm and 100-300 µm Drug-Eluting Beads in Treating Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Study.比较使用 70-150μm 和 100-300μm 载药微球栓塞治疗小肝癌的疗效:一项韩国多中心研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2024 Aug;25(8):715-725. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0231.
2
Conventional Versus Small Doxorubicin-eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Treating Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0/A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.常规与小剂量阿霉素洗脱微球经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌 0/A 期肝细胞癌。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jan;43(1):55-64. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02349-9. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
3
Imaging Changes and Clinical Complications After Drug-Eluting Bead Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Study.不可切除肝细胞癌患者经载药微球与传统经动脉化疗栓塞治疗后的影像学改变及临床并发症:多中心研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Oct;217(4):933-943. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24708. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Survival, efficacy, and safety of small versus large doxorubicin drug-eluting beads TACE chemoembolization in patients with unresectable HCC.小剂量与大剂量多柔比星载药微球 TACE 化疗栓塞治疗不可切除 HCC 患者的生存、疗效和安全性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):W706-14. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12308.
5
Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization treatment with 30-60-μm microspheres in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.经 30-60-μm 微球的经动脉化疗栓塞治疗在肝细胞癌患者中的疗效。
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;64(Suppl 1):131-138. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01351-8. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
6
Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy and safety.常规与载药微球化疗栓塞治疗浸润性肝细胞癌:疗效与安全性比较。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6386-6.
7
Five-year outcome of conventional and drug-eluting transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌患者接受传统及药物洗脱经动脉化疗栓塞术的五年疗效
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 3;18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0848-1.
8
Comparison of Triple-Drug Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) With Single-Drug TACE Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads: Long-Term Survival in 313 Patients.多柔比星洗脱微球载药 TACE 与单纯 TACE 治疗原发性肝癌的长期生存比较:313 例患者分析
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct;209(4):722-732. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18219. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
9
Drug-Eluting Microsphere Versus Cisplatin-Based Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.载药微球与顺铂类药物经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Sep;215(3):745-752. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21669. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Survival, tumour response and safety of 70-150 μm versus 100-300 μm doxorubicin drug-eluting beads in transarterial chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma.70 - 150微米与100 - 300微米阿霉素洗脱微球在肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞中的生存情况、肿瘤反应及安全性
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Dec;63(6):802-811. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12971. Epub 2019 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Duration of Response as Clinical Endpoint: A Quick Guide for Clinical Researchers.作为临床终点的反应持续时间:临床研究人员快速指南
Korean J Radiol. 2024 Nov;25(11):937-941. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0589.

本文引用的文献

1
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.2022KLCA-NCC 韩国肝细胞癌管理实践指南。
Korean J Radiol. 2022 Dec;23(12):1126-1240. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0822.
2
Conventional or Drug-Eluting Beads? Randomized Controlled Study of Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: JIVROSG-1302.传统栓塞微球还是载药微球?肝细胞癌化疗栓塞的随机对照研究:JIVROSG-1302。
Liver Cancer. 2022 Jun 15;11(5):440-450. doi: 10.1159/000525500. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Restricted Mean Survival Time for Survival Analysis: A Quick Guide for Clinical Researchers.
生存分析中的受限平均生存时间:临床研究人员快速指南
Korean J Radiol. 2022 May;23(5):495-499. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0061.
4
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety between 70-150 µm and 100-300 µm Doxorubicin Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.70 - 150微米与100 - 300微米阿霉素药物洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的临床疗效与安全性比较
Life (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;12(2):297. doi: 10.3390/life12020297.
5
Utilizing restricted mean duration of response for efficacy evaluation of cancer treatments.利用限制的缓解持续时间评估癌症治疗的疗效。
Pharm Stat. 2022 Sep;21(5):865-878. doi: 10.1002/pst.2198. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
6
BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update.BCLC 策略用于预后预测和治疗推荐:2022 年更新版。
J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
Prospective Multi-Center Korean Registry of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization with Drug-Eluting Embolics for Nodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Two-Year Outcome Analysis.经导管动脉化疗栓塞术联合载药微球治疗结节性肝细胞癌的前瞻性多中心韩国注册研究:两年随访结果分析。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Oct;22(10):1658-1670. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1117. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
Clinical endpoints in oncology - a primer.肿瘤学中的临床终点——入门指南。
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 Apr 15;11(4):1121-1131. eCollection 2021.
9
Analysis of Response Data for Assessing Treatment Effects in Comparative Clinical Studies.分析用于评估对照临床研究中治疗效果的应答数据。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;173(5):368-374. doi: 10.7326/M20-0104. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: does size really matter?载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌:大小真的重要吗?
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020 May;26(3):230-235. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.19261.