• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常发育儿童与中枢听觉处理障碍儿童的听力努力比较。

Comparison of listening efforts in typically developing children and children with central auditory processing disorders.

作者信息

Spandita H L, Jain Chandni

机构信息

Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;184:112058. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112058. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112058
PMID:39116502
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study's main objective was to compare Listening Effort (LE) in children with central auditory processing disorder [(C)APD] and typically developing children in quiet and at -2 and -6 dB SNR conditions. And to determine the relationship between LE and auditory processing abilities in children with (C)APD.

METHODS

The study included 30 children (15 typically developing children and 15 diagnosed with (C)APD) aged 10-12 years. LE was measured using a dual-tasking paradigm. The primary task required the child to repeat the words. The second task required the child to click the mouse based on the image displayed on the laptop's screen. The primary task was done at quiet, -2 dB SNR, and -6 dB SNR conditions. LE was correlated with dichotic CV, duration pattern test, speech perception in noise - Indian English, and gap detection test in children with (C)APD.

RESULTS

A mixed ANOVA was performed with LE in various conditions as the within-subject factor and group as the between-subject factor for both repetition and reaction time. The study found that LE repetition and reaction time had a significant main effect across conditions and groups. The correlation results revealed a significant relationship between LE reaction time with dichotic scores and GDT thresholds only at -2 dB SNR and -6 dB SNR conditions. There was no significant correlation between other auditory processing abilities and LE under different conditions, such as quiet, SPIN-IE, and DPT at -2 dB SNR and -6 dB SNR.

CONCLUSION

The study emphasizes the importance of cognitive abilities for adequate listening comprehension in challenging situations. As a result, assessing LE in this population may provide additional information for developing therapeutic activities and assisting the child in overcoming listening difficulties.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较患有中枢听觉处理障碍[(C)APD]的儿童与发育正常的儿童在安静环境以及信噪比为-2 dB和-6 dB条件下的听觉努力(LE)。并确定患有(C)APD的儿童的听觉努力与听觉处理能力之间的关系。

方法

该研究纳入了30名年龄在10至12岁之间的儿童(15名发育正常的儿童和15名被诊断为患有(C)APD的儿童)。使用双任务范式测量听觉努力。主要任务要求儿童重复单词。第二项任务要求儿童根据笔记本电脑屏幕上显示的图像点击鼠标。主要任务在安静、信噪比为-2 dB和-6 dB的条件下进行。在患有(C)APD的儿童中,将听觉努力与双耳分听CV、时长模式测试、噪声中的语音感知 - 印度英语以及间隙检测测试进行相关性分析。

结果

进行了混合方差分析,将不同条件下听觉努力作为重复和反应时间的组内因素,将组别作为组间因素。研究发现,听觉努力的重复和反应时间在不同条件和组别之间存在显著的主效应。相关性结果显示,仅在信噪比为-2 dB和-6 dB的条件下,听觉努力反应时间与双耳分听分数和间隙检测阈值之间存在显著关系。在不同条件下,如安静环境、信噪比为-2 dB和-6 dB时的SPIN-IE和DPT,其他听觉处理能力与听觉努力之间没有显著相关性。

结论

该研究强调了认知能力对于在具有挑战性的情况下进行充分听力理解的重要性。因此,评估该人群的听觉努力可能为制定治疗活动和帮助儿童克服听力困难提供额外信息。

相似文献

1
Comparison of listening efforts in typically developing children and children with central auditory processing disorders.正常发育儿童与中枢听觉处理障碍儿童的听力努力比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;184:112058. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112058. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
2
Assessment of children with suspected auditory processing disorder: a factor analysis study.疑似听觉处理障碍儿童的评估:一项因素分析研究。
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):295-305. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000441034.02052.0a.
3
Oscillatory decoupling differentiates auditory encoding deficits in children with listening problems.振荡解耦可区分有听力问题儿童的听觉编码缺陷。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1618-1628. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
4
Assessing Auditory Processing Abilities in Typically Developing School-Aged Children.评估发育正常的学龄儿童的听觉处理能力。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):72-84. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14050.
5
Spectro-temporal modulation detection and its relation to speech perception in children with auditory processing disorder.光谱-时间调制检测及其与听觉处理障碍儿童言语感知的关系。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;131:109860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109860. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Screening Test for Auditory Processing (STAP): a preliminary report.听觉处理筛查测试(STAP):初步报告。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Oct;24(9):867-78. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.9.10.
7
The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder.空间化噪声句子听力测试(LISN-S):与原型LISN的比较以及疑似(中枢)听觉处理障碍或确诊语言障碍儿童的测试结果
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 May;19(5):377-91. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.5.2.
8
Comparison of Diagnostic Auditory Processing Test Scores Measured in Clinical and School Settings.临床与学校环境下诊断性听觉处理测试评分的比较。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Oct 2;51(4):1071-1080. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00020. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
9
Use of Questionnaire-Based Measures in the Assessment of Listening Difficulties in School-Aged Children.基于问卷的测量方法在学龄儿童听力困难评估中的应用。
Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):e300-13. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000180.
10
Effects of speech in noise and dichotic listening intervention programs on central auditory processing disorders.噪声环境下言语及双耳分听干预方案对中枢听觉处理障碍的影响
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;19(3-4):301-16. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp.2008.19.3-4.301.