• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与新辅助化疗后完全细胞减灭术相比,初次减瘤手术时微小残留病的结局。

Outcomes of minimal residual disease at upfront debulking surgery compared with complete cytoreduction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

作者信息

Romero Violeta, Angeles Martina Aida, Rodríguez González Elena, Cabarrou Bastien, Gil-Moreno Antonio, Pérez-Benavente Asunción, Spagnolo Emanuela, Guyon Frédéric, Babin Guillaume, Bebia Vicente, Luzarraga Aznar Ana, Bataillon Guillaume, Bétrian Sarah, Ferron Gwénaël, Hernández Alicia, Martinez Alejandra

机构信息

Gynecological Oncology Unit, La Paz Investigation Institute (IdiPAZ), La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Gynecological Oncology Unit, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Jan 6. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005692.

DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005692
PMID:39117375
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare surgical complexity, post-operative complications, and survival outcomes between patients with minimal residual disease (completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score) CC-1 at the time of primary debulking surgery and those with complete cytoreduction (CC-0) at the time of interval debulking surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC-IV) who underwent cytoreductive surgery achieving either minimal or no residual disease between January 2008 and December 2015. Patients underwent either primary or interval debulking surgery after receiving ≥3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The sub-group of patients with primary debulking surgery/CC-1 was compared with those with interval debulking surgery/CC-0. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 549 patients were included, with upfront surgery performed in 175 patients (31.9%) and 374 patients (68.1%) undergoing interval debulking surgery. After primary debulking surgery, 157/175 (89.7%) had complete cytoreduction and 18/175 (10.3%) had minimal residual disease (primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group), while after interval debulking surgery, 324/374 (86.6%) had complete cytoreduction (interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group) and 50/374 (13.4%) had minimal residual disease. The rate of patients with peritoneal cancer index >10 was 14/17 (82.4%) for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group and 129/322 (40.1%) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 (p<0.001). The rate of patients with an Aletti score of ≥8 was 11/18 (61.1%) and 132/324 (40.7%), respectively (p=0.09) and the rate of major post-operative complications was 5/18 (27.8%) and 64/324 (19.8%), respectively (p=0.38). Overall median disease-free and overall survival were 19.4 months (95% CI 18.0 to 20.6) and 56.7 months (95%CI 50.2 to 65.8), respectively. Median disease-free survival for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group was 16.7 months (95% CI 13.6 to 20.0) versus 18.2 months (95% CI 16.4 to 20.0) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group (p=0.56). Median overall survival for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group was 44.7 months (95% CI 34.3 to not reached) and 49.4 months (95% CI 46.2 to 57.3) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group (p=0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with primary debulking surgery with minimal residual disease and those with interval debulking surgery with no residual disease had similar survival outcomes. Interval surgery should be considered when achieving absence of residual disease is challenging at upfront surgery, given the lower tumor burden found during surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较初次肿瘤细胞减灭术时残留疾病极少(细胞减灭术完成度(CC)评分CC-1)的患者与中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术时达到完全细胞减灭(CC-0)的患者之间的手术复杂性、术后并发症及生存结局。

方法

对2008年1月至2015年12月期间接受肿瘤细胞减灭术且残留疾病极少或无残留疾病的晚期卵巢癌患者(国际妇产科联盟分期IIIC-IV期)进行一项回顾性多中心研究。患者在接受≥3个周期新辅助化疗后接受初次或中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术。将初次肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-1的患者亚组与中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-0的患者进行比较。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计总生存期和无病生存期。

结果

共纳入549例患者,175例(31.9%)接受 upfront手术,374例(68.1%)接受中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术。初次肿瘤细胞减灭术后,157/175例(89.7%)实现了完全细胞减灭,18/175例(10.3%)残留疾病极少(初次肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-1组);而中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术后,324/374例(86.6%)实现了完全细胞减灭(中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-0组),50/374例(13.4%)残留疾病极少。初次肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-1组腹膜癌指数>10的患者比例为14/17(82.4%),中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-0组为129/322(40.1%)(p<0.001)。Aletti评分≥8的患者比例分别为11/18(61.1%)和132/324(40.7%)(p=0.09),主要术后并发症发生率分别为5/18(27.8%)和64/324(19.8%)(p=0.38)。总的无病生存期和总生存期的中位数分别为19.4个月(95%CI 18.0至20.6)和56.7个月(95%CI 50.2至65.8)。初次肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-1组的无病生存期中位数为16.7个月(95%CI 13.6至20.0),中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-0组为18.2个月(95%CI 16.4至20.0)(p=0.56)。初次肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-1组的总生存期中位数为44.7个月(95%CI 34.3至未达到),中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术/CC-0组为49.4个月(95%CI 46.2至57.3)(p=0.97)。

结论

初次肿瘤细胞减灭术残留疾病极少的患者与中间性肿瘤细胞减灭术无残留疾病的患者生存结局相似。鉴于初次手术时实现无残留疾病具有挑战性,而中间性手术时发现的肿瘤负荷较低,因此在初次手术难以实现无残留疾病时应考虑中间性手术。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of minimal residual disease at upfront debulking surgery compared with complete cytoreduction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.与新辅助化疗后完全细胞减灭术相比,初次减瘤手术时微小残留病的结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Jan 6. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005692.
2
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
3
Cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a real-world analysis guided by clinical variables, homologous recombination, and BRCA status.晚期上皮性卵巢癌的细胞减灭术:一项由临床变量、同源重组和BRCA状态指导的真实世界分析
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Jun;35(6):101809. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101809. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
4
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.晚期上皮性卵巢癌初始治疗中,术前新辅助化疗与手术加化疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 10;2(2):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub7.
5
Impact of surgical complexity on disease-free survival and overall survival in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.手术复杂性对新诊断的晚期卵巢癌无病生存期和总生存期的影响。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Jun;35(6):101821. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101821. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
6
Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.晚期上皮性卵巢癌的最佳初次手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10;2011(8):CD007565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007565.pub2.
7
Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.超根治性(广泛)手术与标准手术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的初步细胞减灭术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;8(8):CD007697. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007697.pub3.
8
MIRRORS: a prospective cohort study assessing the feasibility of robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer.MIRRORS:一项评估机器人间隔减瘤术治疗晚期卵巢癌可行性的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Jun 3;34(6):886-897. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005265.
9
Extending the timing for secondary cytoreductive surgery after second-line chemotherapy in relapsed ovarian cancer: the EXTENSION study.延长复发性卵巢癌二线化疗后二次减瘤手术的时间:EXTENSION研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Jun;35(6):101824. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101824. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
10
Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.复发性上皮性卵巢癌的手术细胞减灭术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD008765. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008765.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of tru-cut biopsy and acid cytology from patients operated with suspicious for ovarian cancer*.对疑似卵巢癌患者进行手术时,True-cut活检和酸性细胞学检查的诊断准确性*
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 May 2;71(3):e20240869. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240869. eCollection 2025.