Departments of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Cancer Translational Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Clin Respir J. 2024 Aug;18(8):e13819. doi: 10.1111/crj.13819.
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive tumor with limited effectiveness in its standard chemotherapy treatment. Targeted antiangiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated potential as alternative treatments for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). However, there is insufficient comparative evidence available to determine the optimal first-line treatment option between ICIs plus chemotherapy and targeted antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy.
This study is aimed at analyzing clinical data from ES-SCLC patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College between June 2021 and June 2023. The study compared the efficacy and safety of three first-line treatment regimens: standard chemotherapy, antiangiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy, and immune combination therapy.
Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups: chemotherapy, immune combination therapy, and antiangiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy. The study collected data on clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and adverse reactions. The analysis included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment safety.
A total of 101 patients were included in the study, with 49 receiving chemotherapy alone, 19 receiving antiangiogenic therapy, and 33 receiving immune combination therapy. The ORRs were 78.9% for antiangiogenic therapy, 72.7% for immune combination therapy, and 42.9% for chemotherapy alone. The median PFS was 8.0 months for antiangiogenic therapy, 7.8 months for immune combination therapy, and 5.2 months for chemotherapy alone. Both combination therapy groups demonstrated superior efficacy compared to chemotherapy alone.
Targeted combined chemotherapy and immune combination chemotherapy showed superior efficacy as first-line treatments for ES-SCLC compared to chemotherapy alone, with manageable adverse reactions.
小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种高度侵袭性肿瘤,其标准化疗治疗效果有限。靶向抗血管生成治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已被证明是广泛期 SCLC(ES-SCLC)的替代治疗方法。然而,目前尚无足够的比较证据来确定 ICI 联合化疗与靶向抗血管生成联合化疗之间的最佳一线治疗选择。
本研究旨在分析蚌埠医学院第一附属医院 2021 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间治疗的 ES-SCLC 患者的临床数据。本研究比较了三种一线治疗方案的疗效和安全性:标准化疗、抗血管生成联合化疗和免疫联合治疗。
符合纳入标准的患者被分为三组:化疗组、免疫联合治疗组和抗血管生成联合化疗组。本研究收集了临床特征、治疗方案和不良反应等数据。分析包括客观缓解率(ORR)、缓解持续时间(DoR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和治疗安全性。
共有 101 例患者纳入本研究,其中 49 例接受单纯化疗,19 例接受抗血管生成治疗,33 例接受免疫联合治疗。抗血管生成治疗的 ORR 为 78.9%,免疫联合治疗的 ORR 为 72.7%,单纯化疗的 ORR 为 42.9%。抗血管生成治疗的中位 PFS 为 8.0 个月,免疫联合治疗的中位 PFS 为 7.8 个月,单纯化疗的中位 PFS 为 5.2 个月。联合治疗组均优于化疗组。
与单纯化疗相比,靶向联合化疗和免疫联合化疗作为 ES-SCLC 的一线治疗方案具有更好的疗效,且不良反应可管理。