Suppr超能文献

影响口腔癌引流物排出量的因素。

Factors Affecting Drain Output in Oral Carcinoma.

作者信息

Shetty Teertha, Joshi Poonam, Talole Sanjay, Nair Sudhir, Chaturvedi Pankaj

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, PS Building, ACTREC, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra 410210 India.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Aug;23(4):966-971. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02123-6. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Advanced oral carcinoma surgery results in large denuded areas leading to seroma and hematoma. Closed suction drains obliterate dead space and create negative pressure on wound bed. Non-placement or early removal of drain can lead to various complications, while placement for long duration can cause surgical site infection. The study aims to evaluate factors affecting postoperative neck drain volume, guiding surgeons for decision making for time of drain removal.

METHODS

The study comprised of 222 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection. Demographical, clinical, and surgical details were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 49.1 years. Majority of patients had advanced disease requiring extensive surgery. Patients with radical neck dissection and those reconstructed with pedicled flap had statistically significant drain volume as compared to those with selective neck dissection and free flaps, respectively. Patients with longer duration of surgery, higher blood loss, low postoperative albumin value, and complications showed increased drain volume. Mean duration of drain removal was 7 days, and all drains were removed by day 10.

DISCUSSION

Advanced stage primary disease, radical and modified neck dissections, PMMC flap reconstruction, longer duration of surgery, and higher blood loss had higher drain output. Thus, patient parameters, tumor factors, and surgery factors influence drain output and hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Diligent preoperative and perioperative assessment of various factors can aid trainee surgeons to make decisions for appropriate time for drain removal.

摘要

引言

晚期口腔癌手术会导致大面积裸露区域,进而引发血清肿和血肿。封闭式负压引流可消除死腔并在伤口床形成负压。不放置引流管或过早拔除引流管可能导致各种并发症,而长时间放置则可能引起手术部位感染。本研究旨在评估影响术后颈部引流量的因素,为外科医生决定引流管拔除时间提供指导。

方法

本研究纳入了222例行原发性肿瘤切除及颈部淋巴结清扫术的口腔鳞状细胞癌患者。对患者的人口统计学、临床及手术细节进行回顾性分析。

结果

患者的平均年龄为49.1岁。大多数患者患有晚期疾病,需要进行广泛手术。与选择性颈部淋巴结清扫术和游离皮瓣患者相比,行根治性颈部淋巴结清扫术和带蒂皮瓣重建的患者引流量具有统计学意义。手术时间较长、失血量较多、术后白蛋白值较低以及出现并发症的患者引流量增加。引流管拔除的平均时间为7天,所有引流管均在第10天前拔除。

讨论

晚期原发性疾病、根治性和改良根治性颈部淋巴结清扫术、胸大肌肌皮瓣重建、较长的手术时间以及较多的失血量导致更高的引流量。因此,患者参数、肿瘤因素和手术因素会影响引流量和住院时间。

结论

对各种因素进行认真的术前和围手术期评估,有助于实习外科医生决定合适的引流管拔除时间。

相似文献

1
Factors Affecting Drain Output in Oral Carcinoma.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Aug;23(4):966-971. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02123-6. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Wound drains following thyroid surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD006099. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006099.pub2.
3
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 21;6(6):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub4.
5
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub2.
6
Treatment Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence of Patients with Carcinoma of the Buccal Mucosa.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5209-5220. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04948-6. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
7
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 21;10(10):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub3.
8
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 16;5(5):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub6.
9
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
10
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.

本文引用的文献

1
Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in India.
Sens Int. 2020;1:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100046. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
3
Early postoperative serum albumin levels as predictors of surgical outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S48-S56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
4
What is the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of oral cancer in 2020?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;278(9):3181-3191. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06538-y. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification System in Assessing Head and Neck Surgery Complications.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):24-29. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01718-7. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
9
Comparison of Output Volume Thresholds for Drain Removal After Selective Lateral Neck Dissection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 1;143(12):1195-1199. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1414.
10
Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review.
ISRN Obes. 2014 Feb 20;2014:638936. doi: 10.1155/2014/638936. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验