Department of Periodontology, Sree Sai Dental College & Research Institute, Srikakulam, India.
Department of Periodontics, GITAM Dental College & Hospital, Vishakapatnam, India.
Dent Med Probl. 2024 Jul-Aug;61(4):507-513. doi: 10.17219/dmp/166229.
The clinical and radiographic efficacy of bone grafts and biomaterials, such as platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), for reconstructing lost periodontal structures has been well documented. However, there is limited data regarding the presence of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in an environment with abundant growth factors provided by platelet concentrates.
The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of DFDBA with PRF versus DFDBA alone in the treatment of intrabony defects.
Twenty-four intrabony defects in contralateral sites were randomly assigned to either the DFDBA group or the DFDBA combined with PRF group. Clinical parameters, including the plaque index (PI), the gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), relative attachment level (RAL), and radiographic bone fill (RBF), were measured at baseline, and at 6 and 9 months. Paired and unpaired t-tests were used for intraand intergroup comparisons.
Both the PI and the GI showed statistically significant improvements from baseline to 9 months. However, the intergroup comparisons did not reveal any significant differences (p < 0.05) between the groups with regard to clinical and radiographic measurements from baseline to 9 months.
Platelet-rich fibrin in combination with DFDBA did not show any additional benefit in terms of reconstructive output in the treatment of intrabony defects compared to the use of DFDBA alone.
骨移植物和生物材料(如富含血小板的血浆和富含血小板的纤维蛋白(PRF))在重建牙周结构方面的临床和影像学疗效已有充分记录。然而,关于富含血小板的浓缩物提供的大量生长因子环境中脱钙冻干骨移植物(DFDBA)的存在,数据有限。
本研究的目的是比较 DFDBA 与 PRF 联合 DFDBA 单独治疗骨内缺损的临床和影像学效果。
将 24 个对侧部位的骨内缺损随机分配到 DFDBA 组或 DFDBA 联合 PRF 组。在基线时以及 6 个月和 9 个月时测量临床参数,包括菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊袋深度(PPD)、相对附着水平(RAL)和放射骨填充(RBF)。使用配对和非配对 t 检验进行组内和组间比较。
PI 和 GI 均从基线到 9 个月均显示出统计学显著改善。然而,组间比较在基线到 9 个月时的临床和影像学测量方面没有显示出任何显著差异(p < 0.05)。
与单独使用 DFDBA 相比,富含血小板的纤维蛋白联合 DFDBA 在治疗骨内缺损方面的重建效果方面没有显示出任何额外的益处。