Climate, Air Quality Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Methods in Evidence Synthesis Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lancet Planet Health. 2024 Aug;8(8):e554-e563. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00142-6.
Exposure to floods might increase the risks of adverse birth outcomes. However, the current evidence is scarce, inconsistent, and has knowledge gaps. This study aims to estimate the associations of flood exposure before and during pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and to identify susceptible exposure windows and effect modifiers.
In this cohort study, we obtained all the birth records occurring in Greater Sydney, Australia, from Jan 1, 2001, to Dec 31, 2020, from the New South Wales Midwives Data Collection and in the Brisbane metropolitan region, Australia, from Jan 1, 1995, to Dec 31, 2014, from the Queensland Health Perinatal Data Collection. For each birth, residential address and historical flood information from the Dartmouth Flood Observatory were used to estimate the numbers of days with floods during five exposure windows (Pre-1 was defined as 13-24 weeks before the last menstrual period [LMP], Pre-2 was 0-12 weeks before the LMP, trimester 1 [Tri-1] was 0-12 weeks after the LMP, trimester 2 [Tri-2] was 13-28 weeks after the LMP, and trimester 3 [Tri-3] was ≥29 weeks after the LMP). We estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) of adverse birth outcomes (preterm births, stillbirths, term low birthweight [TLBW], and small for gestational age [SGA]) associated with flood exposures in the five exposure windows using Cox proportional hazards regression models.
1 338 314 birth records were included in our analyses, which included 91 851 (6·9%) preterm births, 9831 (0·7%) stillbirths, 25 567 (1·9%) TLBW, and 108 658 (8·1%) SGA. Flood exposure in Pre-1 was associated with increased risks of TLBW (HR 1·06 [95% CI 1·01-1·12]) and SGA (1·04 [1·01-1·06]); flood exposure during Tri-1 was associated with increased risks of preterm births (1·03 [1·002-1·05]), stillbirth (1·11 [1·03-1·20]), and SGA (1·03 [1·01-1·06]). In contrast, flood exposures during Pre-2 and Tri-3 were associated with reduced risks.
Exposures to floods in Pre-1 and Tri-1 are both associated with increased risks of adverse birth outcomes, and the risks increase with a higher exposure. Upon planning for conception and prenatal care, individuals and health practitioners should raise awareness of the increased risks of adverse birth outcomes after experiencing floods.
The Australian Research Council and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
暴露于洪水可能会增加不良出生结局的风险。然而,目前的证据有限且不一致,并且存在知识空白。本研究旨在评估妊娠前和妊娠期间暴露于洪水与不良出生结局的关联,并确定易感暴露窗口和效应修饰因子。
在这项队列研究中,我们从澳大利亚新南威尔士州的助产士数据收集和澳大利亚布里斯班大都市区的昆士兰健康围产期数据收集获取了 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在大悉尼地区发生的所有出生记录,以及 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间在澳大利亚布里斯班大都市区发生的所有出生记录。对于每个出生记录,使用达特茅斯洪水观测站的居住地址和历史洪水信息来估计五个暴露窗口期间的洪水天数(Pre-1 定义为末次月经前 13-24 周,Pre-2 定义为末次月经前 0-12 周,孕早期 1[Tri-1]定义为末次月经后 0-12 周,孕中期 2[Tri-2]定义为末次月经后 13-28 周,孕晚期 3[Tri-3]定义为末次月经后≥29 周)。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型估计与五个暴露窗口中的洪水暴露相关的不良出生结局(早产、死产、足月低出生体重[TLBW]和小于胎龄儿[SGA])的风险比(HR)。
我们的分析共纳入了 1338314 份出生记录,其中包括 91851(6.9%)例早产、9831(0.7%)例死产、25567(1.9%)例 TLBW 和 108658(8.1%)例 SGA。Pre-1 期间的洪水暴露与 TLBW(HR 1.06[95%CI 1.01-1.12])和 SGA(1.04[1.01-1.06])的风险增加相关;Tri-1 期间的洪水暴露与早产(1.03[1.002-1.05])、死产(1.11[1.03-1.20])和 SGA(1.03[1.01-1.06])的风险增加相关。相比之下,Pre-2 和 Tri-3 期间的洪水暴露与风险降低相关。
Pre-1 和 Tri-1 期间的洪水暴露均与不良出生结局的风险增加相关,且暴露程度越高,风险越大。在计划怀孕和产前保健时,个人和卫生保健从业者应提高对洪水后不良出生结局风险增加的认识。
澳大利亚研究理事会和澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究理事会。