Suppr超能文献

二尖瓣夹合术与心室辅助装置联合用于心源性休克:MITRA-ASSIST注册研究

Combined Use of MITRACLIP and Ventricular ASSIST Devices in Cardiogenic Shock: MITRA-ASSIST Registry.

作者信息

Rivero-Santana Borja, Jurado-Roman Alfonso, Pascual Isaac, Li Chi Hion, Jimenez Pilar, Estevez-Loureiro Rodrigo, Cepas-Guillén Pedro, Benito-González Tomás, Serrador Ana, De La Torre-Hernandez Jose Maria, Avanzas Pablo, Fernandez-Peregrina Estefania, Nombela Luis, Caneiro-Queija Berenice, Freixas Xavier, Fernandez-Vazquez Felipe, Amat-Santos Ignacio, Lee Dae-Hyun, Leon Victor, Arzamendi Dabit, Moreno Raul, Galeote Guillermo

机构信息

Cardiology Department, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.

Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, 28029 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 28;13(15):4408. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154408.

Abstract

Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and mitral regurgitation (MI) have a prohibitive risk that contraindicates surgical treatment. Although the feasibility of transcatheter edge-to-edge therapy (TEER) has been demonstrated in this setting, the benefit of the combined use of TEER with mechanical circulatory support devices (MCS) has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of TEER in patients with MCS. The MITRA-ASSIST study is a retrospective multicentre Spanish registry that included patients with MR and CS who underwent TEER in combination with MCS. The primary endpoint was death from any cause at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalisation for heart failure at 12 months. A total of twenty-four patients in nine high-volume Spanish centres (66.2 (51-82) years, 70.8% female, EuroSCORE II 20.4 ± 17.8) were included. Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction was the main CS aetiology (56%), and the most implanted MCS was the intra-aortic balloon pump (82.6%), followed by ECMO (8.7%), IMPELLACP (4.3%), or a combination of both (4.3%). Procedural success was 95.8%, with 87.5% in-hospital survival. At 12-month follow-up, 25.0% of patients died, and 33.3% had a composite event of death from any cause or hospitalisation for heart failure. TEER in patients with concomitant CS and MR who require MCS appears to be a promising therapeutic alternative with a high device procedural success rate and acceptable mortality and heart failure readmission rates at follow-up.

摘要

心源性休克(CS)和二尖瓣反流(MI)患者面临的风险极高,禁忌进行手术治疗。尽管经导管缘对缘治疗(TEER)在这种情况下的可行性已得到证实,但TEER与机械循环支持设备(MCS)联合使用的益处尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是评估MCS患者接受TEER的临床结局。MITRA-ASSIST研究是一项回顾性多中心西班牙注册研究,纳入了接受TEER联合MCS治疗的MR和CS患者。主要终点是12个月时的任何原因死亡。次要终点是12个月时任何原因死亡或因心力衰竭住院的复合终点。西班牙9个高容量中心的24例患者(66.2(51 - 82)岁,70.8%为女性,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II评分为20.4±17.8)被纳入研究。急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死是CS的主要病因(56%),最常植入的MCS是主动脉内球囊泵(82.6%),其次是体外膜肺氧合(ECMO,8.7%)、IMPELLACP(4.3%)或两者联合使用(4.3%)。手术成功率为95.8%,住院生存率为87.5%。在12个月的随访中,25.0%的患者死亡,33.3%的患者发生了任何原因死亡或因心力衰竭住院的复合事件。对于需要MCS的CS和MR合并患者,TEER似乎是一种有前景的治疗选择,器械手术成功率高,随访时死亡率和心力衰竭再入院率可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d0c/11312753/ee1222a0cc1f/jcm-13-04408-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验