Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Unidad De Rehabilitacion De Fauna Silvestre, Escuela De Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad De Ciencias De La Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Am J Vet Res. 2024 Aug 9;85(10). doi: 10.2460/ajvr.24.05.0143. Print 2024 Oct 1.
To determine if sedation with medetomidine-vatinoxan (Zenalpha; Dechra Veterinary Products) and midazolam (Alvogen) (ZM) would cause less cardiovascular depression and maintain similar depth and duration of sedation in pigeons (Columba livia domestica) compared to dexmedetomidine and midazolam (DM).
In a blinded crossover study, 15 healthy adult domestic pigeons were sedated IM with either dexmedetomidine (0.08 mg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg/kg) or medetomidine (0.16 mg/kg), vatinoxan (3.2 mg/kg), and midazolam (2 mg/kg) from November through December 2023. Each subject was monitored for 60 minutes, then the sedation was reversed with atipamezole (0.8 mg/kg) and flumazenil (0.1 mg/kg) as needed. Sedation scores, heart rates, and respiratory rates were compared.
There was no significant difference in the peak sedation score between DM and ZM groups, with both exhibiting median scores of 4 (heavy sedation). Mean heart rate was significantly higher for ZM than DM at 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 65 minutes postinjection. Bradycardia occurred in both groups at 5 and 10 minutes postinjection and persisted for DM until reversal with atipamezole. Arrhythmias were auscultated in both groups. Bradypnea was not observed in either group, and all birds resumed normal behavior following recovery and the following day.
Medetomidine-vatinoxan-midazolam provides a similar depth of sedation to DM but with less incidence of bradycardia. Further study is needed to determine the clinical applicability of this sedative in birds.
Medetomidine-vatinoxan may be considered for short-term sedation and restraint in cardiovascularly stable pigeons.
确定与右美托咪定-戊乙奎醚(Zenalpha;Dechra Veterinary Products)和咪达唑仑(Alvogen)(ZM)镇静相比,镇静用美托咪定-戊乙奎醚(3.2 毫克/千克)和咪达唑仑(2 毫克/千克)是否会引起鸽子(Columba livia domestica)心血管抑制程度更低,且镇静持续时间和深度相似。
在一项双盲交叉研究中,2023 年 11 月至 12 月,15 只健康成年家鸽通过肌内注射接受右美托咪定(0.08 毫克/千克)和咪达唑仑(2 毫克/千克)或美托咪定(0.16 毫克/千克)、戊乙奎醚(3.2 毫克/千克)和咪达唑仑(2 毫克/千克)镇静。每个研究对象监测 60 分钟,然后根据需要使用阿替美唑(0.8 毫克/千克)和氟马西尼(0.1 毫克/千克)逆转镇静。比较镇静评分、心率和呼吸频率。
DM 和 ZM 组的最大镇静评分无显著差异,两组均表现出 4 分(重度镇静)的中位数评分。与 DM 相比,ZM 在注射后 5、10、20、30、45、60 和 65 分钟时的平均心率显著升高。两组均在注射后 5 和 10 分钟出现心动过缓,DM 组持续至阿替美唑逆转。两组均听诊到心律失常。两组均未观察到呼吸过缓,所有鸟类在恢复和次日均恢复正常行为。
美托咪定-戊乙奎醚-咪达唑仑提供与 DM 相似的镇静深度,但心动过缓发生率较低。需要进一步研究确定这种镇静剂在鸟类中的临床适用性。
美托咪定-戊乙奎醚可考虑用于心血管稳定的鸽子的短期镇静和约束。