Suppr超能文献

纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗以及帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼作为晚期或转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的真实世界医疗费用的长期时间趋势

Long-Term Temporal Trends of Real-World Healthcare Costs Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

作者信息

Du Ella Xiaoyan, Betts Keith A, Wang Travis, Kitchen Sophie A, He Xuanhao, Yin Xin, Guttenplan Sarah B, Beauchamp Karen, Delgado Andrew, Rosenblatt Lisa

机构信息

Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Oncol Ther. 2024 Dec;12(4):735-751. doi: 10.1007/s40487-024-00297-0. Epub 2024 Aug 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) and pembrolizumab plus axitinib (PEM + AXI) are first-line (1L) treatments for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), although the long-term trends in their associated real-world healthcare costs are not well defined. We compared the real-world healthcare costs of patients with aRCC who received 1L NIVO + IPI or PEM + AXI over 24 months.

METHODS

Adults with RCC and secondary malignancy who initiated 1L NIVO + IPI or PEM + AXI were identified in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (01/01/2004 to 09/30/2021). All-cause and RCC-related healthcare costs (unadjusted and adjusted) were assessed per patient per month (PPPM) at 6-month intervals post-treatment initiation (index date) up to 24 months, and differences between the NIVO + IPI and PEM + AXI cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

Of 325 patients with aRCC, 219 received NIVO + IPI and 106 received PEM + AXI as the 1L treatment. According to patients' follow-up length, the analyses for months 7-12 included 210 patients in the NIVO + IPI cohort and 103 in the PEM + AXI cohort; months 13-18 included 119 and 48 patients, respectively; and months 19-24 included 81 and 25 patients. PPPM unadjusted all-cause total costs were $46,348 for NIVO + IPI and $38,097 for PEM + AXI in months 1-6; $26,840 versus $27,983, respectively, in months 7-12; $22,899 versus $25,137 in months 13-18; and $22,279 versus $27,947 in months 19-24. PPPM unadjusted RCC-related costs were $44,059 for NIVO + IPI and $36,456 for PEM + AXI in months 1-6; $25,144 versus $26,692, respectively, in months 7-12; $21,645 versus $23,709 in months 13-18; and $20,486 versus $25,515 in months 19-24. PPPM costs declined more rapidly for patients receiving NIVO + IPI compared to those receiving PEM + AXI, resulting in significantly lower all-cause costs associated with NIVO + IPI during months 19-24 (difference - $10,914 [95% confidence interval - $21,436, - $1091]) and RCC-related costs during months 7-12 (- $4747 [(- $8929, - $512]) and 19-24 (- $10,261 [- $20,842, - $421]) after adjustment. Cost savings for NIVO + IPI versus PEM + AXI were driven by differences in drug costs which, after adjustment, were significantly lower in months 7-12 (difference - $5555 [all-cause], - $5689 [RCC-related]); 13-18 (- $7217 and - $6870, respectively); and 19-24 (- $16,682 and - $16,125).

CONCLUSION

Although the real-world PPPM healthcare costs of 1L NIVO + IPI were higher compared with PEM + AXI in the first 6 months of treatment, the costs associated with NIVO + IPI rapidly declined thereafter, resulting in significantly lower costs vs. PEM + AXI from months 7 to 24.

摘要

简介

纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗(NIVO + IPI)和帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼(PEM + AXI)是晚期或转移性肾细胞癌(aRCC)的一线(1L)治疗方案,尽管其相关真实世界医疗费用的长期趋势尚不清楚。我们比较了接受1L NIVO + IPI或PEM + AXI治疗24个月的aRCC患者的真实世界医疗费用。

方法

在默克多市场扫描商业数据库和医疗保险补充数据库(2004年1月1日至2021年9月30日)中识别出开始使用1L NIVO + IPI或PEM + AXI治疗的患有RCC和继发性恶性肿瘤的成年人。在治疗开始(索引日期)后的6个月间隔内,直至24个月,评估每位患者每月(PPPM)的全因和RCC相关医疗费用(未调整和调整后),并比较NIVO + IPI和PEM + AXI队列之间的差异。

结果

在325例aRCC患者中,219例接受NIVO + IPI作为1L治疗,106例接受PEM + AXI作为1L治疗。根据患者的随访时长,第7 - 12个月的分析中,NIVO + IPI队列有210例患者,PEM + AXI队列有103例患者;第13 - 18个月分别有119例和48例患者;第19 - 24个月分别有81例和25例患者。在第1 - 6个月,PPPM未调整的全因总成本,NIVO + IPI为46,348美元,PEM + AXI为38,097美元;在第7 - 12个月,分别为26,840美元和27,983美元;在第13 - 18个月,分别为22,899美元和25,137美元;在第19 - 24个月,分别为22,279美元和27,947美元。在第1 - 6个月,PPPM未调整的RCC相关费用,NIVO + IPI为44,059美元,PEM + AXI为36,456美元;在第7 - 12个月,分别为25,144美元和26,692美元;在第13 - 18个月,分别为21,645美元和23,709美元;在第19 - 24个月,分别为20,486美元和25,515美元。与接受PEM + AXI的患者相比,接受NIVO + IPI的患者PPPM成本下降更快,导致在第19 - 24个月与NIVO + IPI相关的全因成本显著更低(差异 - 10,914美元[95%置信区间 - 21,436美元, - 1091美元]),在第7 - 12个月和第19 - 24个月调整后的RCC相关成本也更低(分别为 - 4747美元[( - 8929美元, - 512美元)]和 - 10,261美元[ - 20,842美元, - 421美元])。NIVO + IPI相对于PEM + AXI的成本节省是由药物成本差异驱动的,调整后,在第7 - 12个月(全因差异 - 5555美元,RCC相关差异 - 5689美元)、第13 - 18个月(分别为 - 7217美元和 - 6870美元)以及第19 - 24个月(分别为 - 16,682美元和 - 16,125美元)显著更低。

结论

尽管在治疗的前六个月,1L NIVO + IPI的真实世界PPPM医疗费用高于PEM + AXI,但此后与NIVO + IPI相关的费用迅速下降,导致在第7至24个月,与PEM + AXI相比成本显著更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc9f/11573941/30631f267e6f/40487_2024_297_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

4
First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
9
First-line Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Immuno-oncology Era: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Aug;18(4):244-251.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

2
The renal cell carcinoma drug market.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024 Jan;23(1):16-17. doi: 10.1038/d41573-023-00186-7.
4
Real-world Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Current Treatment Era.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Feb 6;49:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.015. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2022 Update.
Eur Urol. 2022 Nov;82(5):529-542. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.019. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
9
Real world data on IO-based therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):3249-3258. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04173-0. Epub 2022 Jul 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验